Re: TCPIP V5.4, SMTP & non-existant users
From: Steven M. Schweda (sms_at_antinode.org)
Date: 10/10/05
- Next message: bob_at_instantwhip.com: "Re: TCPware starts up, then shuts down"
- Previous message: Chris: "TCPware starts up, then shuts down"
- Maybe in reply to: healyzh_at_aracnet.com: "TCPIP V5.4, SMTP & non-existant users"
- Next in thread: jordan_at_ccs4vms.com: "Re: TCPIP V5.4, SMTP & non-existant users"
- Reply: jordan_at_ccs4vms.com: "Re: TCPIP V5.4, SMTP & non-existant users"
- Reply: JF Mezei: "Re: TCPIP V5.4, SMTP & non-existant users"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2005 10:47:55 -0500 (CDT)
From: JORDAN <rjordan@mindspring.com>
> I assume you restarted the SMTP services after modifying the config
> file? I know its working at our customer sites because I was having to
> clean out the mail files every day or two (and I had to write a
> reversion utility too), but after turning on that option the problems
> cleared up almost completely.
I always restart SMTP after changing SMTP.CONFIG. I even have a
SMTP_RESTART.COM for the purpose.
> Try sending mail from an external source to bogus email addresses on
> your node and see what happens. This is what I get [...]
I think that you'll enjoy this. First try:
RCPT TO: 1234567890@antinode.org
550 < 1234567890@antinode.org> ... Addressee undeliverable
So it _does_ work. But why am I getting all the junk bounces? Well,
let's try a more realistic test (bad address extraction typical of some
of the junk mail distributors):
RCPT TO: antinode.orgsms@antinode.org
250 < antinode.orgsms@antinode.org>... Recipient OK
Or, one of the Korean drug dealer's (many forged) addresses:
RCPT TO: farwredjulianna@antinode.org
250 < farwredjulianna@antinode.org>... Recipient OK
So it really _doesn't_ work. Hmmm.
RCPT TO: grrrrrrrrrrr@antinode.org
550 < grrrrrrrrrrr@antinode.org> ... Addressee undeliverable
RCPT TO: grrrrrrrrrrrr@antinode.org
250 < grrrrrrrrrrrr@antinode.org>... Recipient OK
And now it becomes clear. Invalid names no longer than 12 characters
are undeliverable. Invalid names longer than 12 characters are OK.
I'm sure glad that someone added this helpful feature. Now, if only
we could get the junk e-mailers to cooperate by using suitably short
randomly generated names ...
If the longest valid name is 12 characters long, why would we think
that a longer name is "OK"? ARRGH! Who tests this stuff?
If someone whips out a quick fix for this, I'd be happy to give it a
try. Just as a reminder:
alp $ tcpip show version
HP TCP/IP Services for OpenVMS Alpha Version V5.4 - ECO 5
on a COMPAQ Professional Workstation XP1000 running OpenVMS V7.3-2
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Steven M. Schweda (+1) 651-699-9818
382 South Warwick Street sms@antinode-org
Saint Paul MN 55105-2547
- Next message: bob_at_instantwhip.com: "Re: TCPware starts up, then shuts down"
- Previous message: Chris: "TCPware starts up, then shuts down"
- Maybe in reply to: healyzh_at_aracnet.com: "TCPIP V5.4, SMTP & non-existant users"
- Next in thread: jordan_at_ccs4vms.com: "Re: TCPIP V5.4, SMTP & non-existant users"
- Reply: jordan_at_ccs4vms.com: "Re: TCPIP V5.4, SMTP & non-existant users"
- Reply: JF Mezei: "Re: TCPIP V5.4, SMTP & non-existant users"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|