Re: Will Digital's abandonned software ever go "public" ?
phil_at_rephil.org
Date: 11/11/05
- Next message: Hein RMS van den Heuvel: "Re: EDIT / EDT with change command issue"
- Previous message: Hein RMS van den Heuvel: "Re: File spec wildcard match test?"
- In reply to: Bill Gunshannon: "Re: Will Digital's abandonned software ever go "public" ?"
- Next in thread: Michael Kraemer: "Re: Will Digital's abandonned software ever go "public" ?"
- Reply: Michael Kraemer: "Re: Will Digital's abandonned software ever go "public" ?"
- Reply: Bill Gunshannon: "Re: Will Digital's abandonned software ever go "public" ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: 10 Nov 2005 21:53:03 -0800
Bill Gunshannon wrote:
> In article <890539d90511031104m64b98fd8t190fe4bae9b47414@mail.gmail.com>,
> Carl Friedberg <frida.fried@gmail.com> writes:
> > I seem to remember this was where I first heard the term "Cutler
> > coding". It referred (to DNC, of course) to Dave's abhorrence of any
> > wasted locations -- he would dig around for an instruction which
> > had the right value to use as a constant...
>
> This was more common than you might think, especially in the early
> microcomputer days (remember, 28K Words is not much memory).
<SNIP>
> JMPing into the middle of the address saved the programmer
> one byte of memory.
I'm a day late and a dollar short, but while it was certainly more
common, Cutler was absolutely brutal about it. He came over from
DuPont to do RSX-11M, the small memory version of RSX, and he inspected
*every* line of code in the system. If he could write it smaller, you
got it returned. (He had a stamp that said, "Size is the Goal," but I
wouldn't be surprised if the slightly more risque version -- that his
stamp said "Size Matters" -- were true.)
My father, who wrote the -11M error-logging subsystem, is really proud
(to this day!) about the fact that he was able to successfully argue
his case when he wanted to use two *BITS* that Cutler didn't think were
needed, until he heard the proposal.
No; there is not a lot of unnecessary repetition in RSX-11M! (perhaps
-11D, probably -11A)
Incidentally, I think that coding this tight is one thing that makes
for the reliability of RSX and VMS, and my personal bias is to suggest
that just becuase memory's cheap doesn't mean that coding should
necessariy be approached any differently -- but that's just (my)
armchair philosophy.
Cheers,
Phil Mendelsohn
- Next message: Hein RMS van den Heuvel: "Re: EDIT / EDT with change command issue"
- Previous message: Hein RMS van den Heuvel: "Re: File spec wildcard match test?"
- In reply to: Bill Gunshannon: "Re: Will Digital's abandonned software ever go "public" ?"
- Next in thread: Michael Kraemer: "Re: Will Digital's abandonned software ever go "public" ?"
- Reply: Michael Kraemer: "Re: Will Digital's abandonned software ever go "public" ?"
- Reply: Bill Gunshannon: "Re: Will Digital's abandonned software ever go "public" ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|