Re: shared queue and direct printing via TCPIP DECservers
From: Bob Koehler (koehler_at_eisner.nospam.encompasserve.org)
Date: 11/18/05
- Previous message: Sharon: "Re: Illuminata says Itanium was a mistake."
- In reply to: Rich Jordan: "shared queue and direct printing via TCPIP DECservers"
- Next in thread: Rich Jordan: "Re: shared queue and direct printing via TCPIP DECservers"
- Reply: Rich Jordan: "Re: shared queue and direct printing via TCPIP DECservers"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: 18 Nov 2005 12:02:54 -0600
In article <1132332008.863372.132560@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>, "Rich Jordan" <jordan@ccs4vms.com> writes:
>
> Direct printing (where an LTA device is created and associated with the
> specific MUXserver and port, but no queue or spooling is used) was set
> up to provide maximum control of the printer by the program; it queries
> the user for alignment and such on expensive pre-print forms before
> generating print output. Mostly thats on the DMPs.
>
> The laser queues are set up normally; LTA device created and associated
> with the MUX server and port, queue aimed at the LTA device, LTA device
> spooled to queue. However for check printing these old program also
> stop the queue, despool the LTA device, and print direct. We are
> looking at how much work it will take to switch check printing to
> spooled. We don't have dedicated check printers so thats not an
> option.
>
> The DMPs in our test environment are working with the
> TELNET/CREATE/RECONNECT option, though there are limitations (like the
> printer going offline not being detected so jobs go to the bit bucket).
> However the lasers are an issue; we would like to run them as
> telnetsym queues, but can't do that with a direct TNA port created (as
> for the DMPs).
>
> So if the queue is up, and someone needs to print checks, we
> stop/queue/reset the queue, despool the (LTA device, which will likely
> be retained for its name and as spool target), create the direct port
> (requires privs), do the direct print job, then delete the direct port,
> and restart/respool the queue.
>
Sounds like a job for print queue forms. Have you tried using those?
- Previous message: Sharon: "Re: Illuminata says Itanium was a mistake."
- In reply to: Rich Jordan: "shared queue and direct printing via TCPIP DECservers"
- Next in thread: Rich Jordan: "Re: shared queue and direct printing via TCPIP DECservers"
- Reply: Rich Jordan: "Re: shared queue and direct printing via TCPIP DECservers"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|