Re: OT: Mozilla/Firefox (was:Re: Windoze ends year with a major cert ...)



On 31 Dec 2005 18:42:30 +0100, Peter 'EPLAN' LANGSTOEGER
<peter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> In article <1136042848.340473.60300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "AEF" <spamsink2001@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> >Peter 'EPLAN' LANGSTOEGER wrote:
> >> In article <1136008191.090269.32670@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "AEF" <spamsink2001@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> >> >Firefox and Mozilla are different browsers?
> >>
> >> Yes, but they are relatives. Both (and more) are from http://www.mozilla.org
> >> Mozilla is a suite of browser, mail/news client, IRC client and HTML editor.
> >> Firefox is a (small=fast) browser only, thunderbird a mail/news client only.
> >> Mozilla (suite) is what was formerly existing as netscape navigator gold.
> >
> >So Mozilla is both the suite and the browser in that suite and Firefox
> >is a standalone from the same organization. Why isn't the standalone
> >browser the same as the suite browser?
>
> Don't know. And just to confuse you, MOZILLA is still the browser with more
> settings to select. I would like to love firefox, but as long as it doesn't
> run on VMS (and still has fewer controls) it will loose against MOZILLA here.
> btw MOZILLA and Firefox do share _a lot_ of code...
>
> >Please don't bring Netscape into this. That only makes it more
> >confusing.
>
> Not if you already lived in the internet a decade ago.
>
> I'm with e-mails since 1-Mar-1983 (Mail-11, not SMTP ;-) and with internet
> since 6-Apr-1991 (IP, not UUCP). My first browser was NCSA MOSAIC sometime
> 1994. It was free. Not so the NETSCAPE browser we bought in hundreds a few
> years later. Another few years later NETSCAPE became free too (the browser,
> the webserver was never free, but some more years later was obsoleted by M$)
> It's a shame that I don't remember my first webserver then in 1994 now...
>
> > And now there's a com AND org? WHY?
>
> That's called marketing. Some people love to try .COM URLs first.
>
> >> You sound unwilling not unable...
> >
> >I don't want to spend a lot of time with stuff that everyone says is
> >wonderful but when I get it I find it to be instead a PITA. With IE
> >I've already learned its quirks and can live with it and for me it is
> >better than Firefox 1.0. I'll have to try Firefox 1.5 but I am inclined
> >to believe that it won't address any of my complaints. Then I'll have
> >to download the entire Mozilla suite and mess with that. More time
> >possibly wasted to only find that I prefer IE after all. There are
> >things I hate about IE, but I still find it better than Firefox 1.0.
> >It's a little like QWERTY vs. Dvorak. I'd love to try the Dvorak
> >keyboard, except that I hear there is a considerable learning curve and
> >then you are stuck using only your own stuff or have to become
> >"ambidextrous" with the two styles.
>
> Run your browser on VMS and you only have the choice of SWB - which is
> MOZILLA - (and some more but unfortunately non-current browsers like
> MOSAIC, LYNX, NETSCAPE Navigator Gold V3.03, ... you surely love to hate)
>
> Happy Newyear
>
> --
> Peter "EPLAN" LANGSTOEGER
> Network and OpenVMS system specialist
> E-mail peter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> A-1030 VIENNA AUSTRIA I'm not a pessimist, I'm a realist
>

Another option- that of building a tweaked Windows installation CD
that doesn't install Internet Explorer, Outlook Express and a host of
other exploitables that come with W2K out-of-the-box can be found at
http://www.vorck.com/remove-ie.html

I've used his methodology and it works quite well.

However, as I said on their forum, when it comes to Windows security,
you can't un-Swiss the cheese...

The downside to using this method is that you have to add a number of
freeware packages to make up for things that have been stripped out
for security reasons.



WWWebb
--
NOTE: This email address is only used for noncommerical VMS-related
correspondence.
All unsolicited commercial email will be deemed to be a request for
services pursuant to the terms and conditions located at
http://bellsouthpwp.net/w/e/webbww/
.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: OT: Mozilla/Firefox (was:Re: Windoze ends year with a major cert ...)
    ... >> Mozilla is a suite of browser, mail/news client, IRC client and HTML editor. ... >So Mozilla is both the suite and the browser in that suite and Firefox ...
    (comp.os.vms)
  • Re: OT: Mozilla/Firefox (was:Re: Windoze ends year with a major cert ...)
    ... >>Firefox and Mozilla are different browsers? ... > Mozilla is a suite of browser, mail/news client, IRC client and HTML editor. ...
    (comp.os.vms)
  • Re: Thunerbird help... [not java related , but please help if you can!]
    ... Mozilla 1.7 - Internet Application Suite includes browser, email, HTML editor ... But it is also included in the Mozilla Suite together with the browser and the html editor. ...
    (comp.lang.java.programmer)
  • Re: Mozilla/IE6
    ... > Mozilla suite of apps includes a browser, but I didn't see where the ... Mozilla is a suite, including a browser, email program, etc. ... based on the Gecko engine. ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.inetexplorer.ie6.browser)
  • OT: question about HTTP headers
    ... I also tried installing the Win32 Mozilla in WINE, ... WINE and the site would actually believe that it was a Win32-base browser. ... I used wget to download the two .asp scripts that run when you first bring up the page, but I could not find in the browser identification code where this particular information was pulled from. ...
    (Debian-User)

Quantcast