Re: Good OpenVMS presentation (slides # powerpoint)
- From: "FredK" <fred.nospam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2006 17:00:21 -0500
DDR-II and PCI-E are both transparent to users except perhaps for
performance. Just as NUMA is generally transparent at the user application
level except for performance.
"JF Mezei" <jfmezei.spamnot@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:43D7F09D.F68921E5@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Robert Deininger wrote:
> > BTW, DDR-II and PCI-E are both in the pipeline for Integrity systems and
VMS.
>
> Does VMS *need* to be aware of the memory architecture ?
>
> I realise that in the case of GS/Wildfire class machines, knowing about
> the intimate interconnect design can help VMS take advantage of the
> memory system and avoid bottlenecks and increase performance, but woudl
> it be strictly necessary if you just had independant instance(s) of VMS ?
>
> Also for regular systems, would VMS be aware of the memory system at all
> ? Wouldn't that be all hardware with VMS seeing just one large
> continuously accessible memory ?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Good OpenVMS presentation (slides # powerpoint)
- From: JF Mezei
- Re: Good OpenVMS presentation (slides # powerpoint)
- References:
- Good OpenVMS presentation (slides # powerpoint)
- From: Syltrem
- Re: Good OpenVMS presentation (slides # powerpoint)
- From: Neil Rieck
- Re: Good OpenVMS presentation (slides # powerpoint)
- From: Robert Deininger
- Re: Good OpenVMS presentation (slides # powerpoint)
- From: JF Mezei
- Good OpenVMS presentation (slides # powerpoint)
- Prev by Date: Re: Telnet over WAN latency troubleshooting
- Next by Date: Re: The processor wars Part 1, "The death of Alpha"
- Previous by thread: Re: Good OpenVMS presentation (slides # powerpoint)
- Next by thread: Re: Good OpenVMS presentation (slides # powerpoint)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|