Re: FOR070.DAT files appearing
- From: koehler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Bob Koehler)
- Date: 31 Jan 2006 12:34:41 -0600
In article <449f4hF125haU1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, bill@xxxxxxxxxxx (Bill Gunshannon) writes:
>
> Maybe you mis-understood what I was advocating. I believe in explicit
> definitions. You know like Pascal, C, Ada and pretty much every language
> since Fortran has required. Declare before use. No implicit declarations.
> If that is going to "cause the cost of maintaining a system to stay up",
> then why did all these languages decide it was necessary?
>
>>
>>> Buffer overflows are not the only example of bad code.
>>
>> Yes. You insistence on over specifying is another example of bad
>> code.
>
> Now I am sure you mis-understood what I said. Where did I advocate
> "over specifying"? I merely said that the Fortran concept of not
> requiring things like variables (and yes, external files) to be pre-
> declared before use was a bad idea dn led to much harder to understand
> programs. Especially after the passage of time and possibly the passage
> of the original writer.
OK, so we're chasing two different horses.
.
- References:
- Re: FOR070.DAT files appearing
- From: Steven M. Schweda
- Re: FOR070.DAT files appearing
- From: Bill Gunshannon
- Re: FOR070.DAT files appearing
- Prev by Date: Re: Cluster timeouts question
- Next by Date: Re: Cluster timeouts question
- Previous by thread: Re: FOR070.DAT files appearing
- Next by thread: Re: FOR070.DAT files appearing
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading