Re: [OpenVMS Alpha V7.3-2] Batch/Print Job Numbering
- From: JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2006 16:58:55 -0500
Dave Froble wrote:
His problem is that the entry number with the problem is not the first
use of that job number that day. It's the second, or third use of the
job number.
Actually, it doesn't matter.
If all your jobs have the same logfile name, then you have a gazillion
jobNAME.log files without any tie in to the original job number in your
directory. If you do a /RETAIN=ERROR, does the SHOW ENTRY/FULL for a
failed job give you the exact log file name with version number or just
the generic logfile name without a version number ?
And as soon as job 471 is declared failed and /RETAINed on error, then
"471" will no longer be re-used until the job is deleted.
So having different log files for each job seems to be the best solution.
.
- References:
- [OpenVMS Alpha V7.3-2] Batch/Print Job Numbering
- From: Peter 'EPLAN' LANGSTOEGER
- Re: [OpenVMS Alpha V7.3-2] Batch/Print Job Numbering
- From: David J Dachtera
- Re: [OpenVMS Alpha V7.3-2] Batch/Print Job Numbering
- From: Peter 'EPLAN' LANGSTOEGER
- Re: [OpenVMS Alpha V7.3-2] Batch/Print Job Numbering
- From: Phillip Helbig---remove CLOTHES to reply
- Re: [OpenVMS Alpha V7.3-2] Batch/Print Job Numbering
- From: Dave Froble
- [OpenVMS Alpha V7.3-2] Batch/Print Job Numbering
- Prev by Date: Re: "A Historical Look at the VAX"
- Next by Date: Re: [OpenVMS Alpha V7.3-2] Batch/Print Job Numbering
- Previous by thread: Re: [OpenVMS Alpha V7.3-2] Batch/Print Job Numbering
- Next by thread: Re: [OpenVMS Alpha V7.3-2] Batch/Print Job Numbering
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|