Re: IMCB$V_PARENT_PROT What is it good for?
- From: "Richard Maher" <maher_rj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 22:56:34 +0800
Hi Ian,
(But before I go :-)
which is propagated to shareable images activated
subsequently
That simply cannot be! Wash your mouth out. What you are alluding to is
clearly a pointless piece of redundancy.
Cheers Richard Maher
"Ian Miller" <ijm@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1145368839.130610.223730@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
It says
"If either IAC$V_PARANOID or IAC$V_PROTECTED was specified in the
FLAGS argument, the image activator checks that the image was installed
and, if not, returns the error status SS$_PRIVINSTALL to its requestor.
If
IAC$V_PROTECTED was specified, the image must also have been installed
/PROTECTED. If the image passes these checks, the image activator sets
IMCB$V_PARENT_PROT, which is propagated to shareable images activated
subsequently to ensure that similar checks are made for them."
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: IMCB$V_PARENT_PROT What is it good for?
- From: Ian Miller
- Re: IMCB$V_PARENT_PROT What is it good for?
- References:
- IMCB$V_PARENT_PROT What is it good for?
- From: Richard Maher
- Re: IMCB$V_PARENT_PROT What is it good for?
- From: Ian Miller
- IMCB$V_PARENT_PROT What is it good for?
- Prev by Date: Re: IMCB$V_PARENT_PROT What is it good for?
- Next by Date: Re: IMCB$V_PARENT_PROT What is it good for?
- Previous by thread: Re: IMCB$V_PARENT_PROT What is it good for?
- Next by thread: Re: IMCB$V_PARENT_PROT What is it good for?
- Index(es):