Re: Partitioned cluster question (reboot during lost quorum)
- From: Hoff Hoffman <hoff-remove-this@xxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 14:29:45 GMT
Phillip Helbig---remove CLOTHES to reply wrote:
In article <1145449215.629422.111660@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
etmsreec@xxxxxxxxxxx writes:
That said, I know of at least one system manager that specifically sets
his clusters up with an EXPECTED_VOTES of 1 on every node so that
should the network links fail and should they need to reboot one node
all alone in the event of a failure that affects the other nodes they
can do so. I see his line of reasoning, but don't necessarily agree.
In that case, do a minimum boot. This guy can get toasted by a partitioned cluster.
Ayup. One of the local engineers accidentally booted into that configuration, with a simple console command mistake and mis-set voting parameters and a shared SCSI. The corruptions that resulted were quite impressive.
.
- References:
- Partitioned cluster question (reboot during lost quorum)
- From: JF Mezei
- Re: Partitioned cluster question (reboot during lost quorum)
- From:
- Re: Partitioned cluster question (reboot during lost quorum)
- From: JF Mezei
- Re: Partitioned cluster question (reboot during lost quorum)
- From: etmsreec
- Re: Partitioned cluster question (reboot during lost quorum)
- From: Phillip Helbig---remove CLOTHES to reply
- Partitioned cluster question (reboot during lost quorum)
- Prev by Date: Re: Partitioned cluster question (reboot during lost quorum)
- Next by Date: Sending mail via TLS
- Previous by thread: Re: Partitioned cluster question (reboot during lost quorum)
- Next by thread: Re: Partitioned cluster question (reboot during lost quorum)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|