Re: XtRemoveTimeOut() with value of 0 accvios under 7.3-2, but not
- From: JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 15:32:23 -0400
Hoff Hoffman wrote:
Is the timer null? If it is, it's not valid, and it's a bug in the
calling code.
Is there documentation that clearly states that getting a XtIntervalId
of 0 after calling XtAddTimeOut means that there was an error ?
The doc I have seen doesn't say anything about it, and the routines hand
you an opaque value (the XtIntervalID).
.
- References:
- XtRemoveTimeOut() with value of 0 accvios under 7.3-2, but not under 7.1-2
- From: Z
- Re: XtRemoveTimeOut() with value of 0 accvios under 7.3-2, but not under 7.1-2
- From: davidc
- Re: XtRemoveTimeOut() with value of 0 accvios under 7.3-2, but not
- From: George Cook
- Re: XtRemoveTimeOut() with value of 0 accvios under 7.3-2, but not
- From: Z
- Re: XtRemoveTimeOut() with value of 0 accvios under 7.3-2, but not
- From: Hoff Hoffman
- XtRemoveTimeOut() with value of 0 accvios under 7.3-2, but not under 7.1-2
- Prev by Date: Re: XtRemoveTimeOut() with value of 0 accvios under 7.3-2, but not
- Next by Date: Re: Compressing backup file
- Previous by thread: Re: XtRemoveTimeOut() with value of 0 accvios under 7.3-2, but not
- Next by thread: Re: XtRemoveTimeOut() with value of 0 accvios under 7.3-2, but not
- Index(es):