Re: So how representative is this experience ?
- From: Dave Froble <davef@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 02:52:18 -0400
Bill Gunshannon wrote:
In article <e5d9jn$19o$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
"Richard Maher" <maher_rj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
Hi,
and theAny more details on this? To help other porters.
problems caused by compilers optimisations were vast.
Let me guess, VMS Engineering's (or the public face of) response was "Oooh,
I wouldn't have done it that way" or "If I was trying to get there I
certainly wouldn't start from here" or "During the war. . .".
As a result they decided it would be easier and less risky toIs this not really just someone's political agend to seize the opportunity
re-impliment from scratch on Windows.
to change architecture? That is, Windows would look better on their CV, VMS
is perceived as legacy, yadda, yadda, yadda (Same stuff for last 15 years
:-)
Didfn't sound like it. They tried moving to Itanium and it didn't work.
Just because one group failed in this effort in no way defines anything. There could have been real problems, or, there could have been a bunch of incompentents, or, anywhere in between.
However, that a group did fail, should give others the idea that perhaps more research is called for, and trying to determine why a group failed would also be called for. If you don't learn from other's mistakes, then you'll possibly repeat them.
I'm sure if the right people in HP new of the specific problems then the
FACTS could make it harder to justify a move.
less riskyYep re-implementing from stratch is a walk in the park! How risky could that
be? (Good news is they'll never fully replace the functionality of the old
system
On what do you base this little gem?
I'll add some weight to that concept. From actual experience. Applications that grow over time usually have more capabilities than can be determined in the short time a group doing a total re-write will usually devote to such. Their product will have some missing features, will have new bugs, and may or may not serve the needs of the users.
Note that some omitted capabilities are no longer required. Some may not be in use now, but may be needed in the future.
I've participated in these things. At best it's a horizontal move. Much more often it's backsliding. That's just how things have actually occured.
and will end up having to upgrade to itanium anyway.
Now I don't see how that is determined.
And how do you dras this conclusion? They moved to Windows which doesn't
now and never will run in Itanium.
bill
--
David Froble Tel: 724-529-0450
Dave Froble Enterprises, Inc. E-Mail: davef@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
DFE Ultralights, Inc.
170 Grimplin Road
Vanderbilt, PA 15486
.
- References:
- So how representative is this experience ?
- From: mas
- Re: So how representative is this experience ?
- From: Richard Maher
- Re: So how representative is this experience ?
- From: Bill Gunshannon
- So how representative is this experience ?
- Prev by Date: Re: FTP security suggestion, and SHOW INTRUSION BUG
- Next by Date: Re: ANN: VMS Mosaic 4.0
- Previous by thread: Re: So how representative is this experience ?
- Next by thread: Re: So how representative is this experience ?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|