Re: The possibility of vms opening up?
- From: "geletine" <adaviscg1@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 5 Jul 2006 08:46:44 -0700
Larry Kilgallen wrote:
In article <1152100090.638589.133370@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "geletine" <adaviscg1@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
Main, Kerry wrote:
2. If a security patch does get released, at the local level, whoIf you look at the linux kernel for instance, all fixes are released in
ensures the patch does not break clustering, forward-backward
compatibility or other specific configs like an older version of the OS
? The responsibility for testing and ensuring OS compatibility with all
of the other OS and layered product patches falls on the shoulder of the
local IT person. For some shops with very knowledgeable technical staff,
that may be acceptable.
patches and support the older kernels for backward compatibility.
The issue is not the _intentions_ regarding compatibility.
The question was "who ensures the patch does not break...". The
average single contributor does not have the resources to test a
patch in all environments, particularly on large SMP machines with
particular hardware devices. In some cases we are talking machines
that cost in excess of a million dollars.
A company that has machines in excess of million dollars would have a
IT department that would do testing, alot of open source projects come
out of real work enviroments, they are not all made at home in
somebodies spare time(thats a bad misconception of open source), ibm,
sun to name two have released different open source projects.
.
- References:
- RE: The possibility of vms opening up?
- From: Main, Kerry
- Re: The possibility of vms opening up?
- From: geletine
- Re: The possibility of vms opening up?
- From: Larry Kilgallen
- RE: The possibility of vms opening up?
- Prev by Date: Re: The possibility of vms opening up?
- Next by Date: Re: The possibility of vms opening up?
- Previous by thread: Re: The possibility of vms opening up?
- Next by thread: Re: The possibility of vms opening up?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|