Re: Alpha remembrance day
- From: "Villy Madsen" <Villy.Madsen@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 04 Sep 2006 04:08:25 GMT
That's called single-level storage, and IBM has spent decades making it
work reasonably well in its i-series platforms. But it's worth noting
that they've never attempted to expand its use to their other offerings:
it's definitely not for everyone (and arguably not even for i-series, but
with a significant piece of their existing customer base so heavily
invested in it it's hard to back away from now).
Having spent a good ten years of my life supporting the AS/400s (almost from
the beginning of that branding until some years ago), I would say that
there is something very elegant about single-level storage. It fits very
nicely with memory mapped IO, which we see in all sorts of operating
systems - including (wonder of wonders) openvms...
It also made it very simple to add dasd (as IBM always liked to call it) -
again I think simpler than on openvms.
Don't get me wrong - those two systems OS/400 & VMS are my favorites. I
prefer the OS400 - everything is an object within a database concept and the
extensive job and system logging that is available for commercial
applications (if they are done right). The tight coupling between the OS &
the db is really nice.
I prefer VMS for technically orientated applications.... (but then that's
all I ever used it for)...
Villy
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Alpha remembrance day
- From: Bill Todd
- Re: Alpha remembrance day
- References:
- Re: Alpha remembrance day
- From: Glenn Everhart
- Re: Alpha remembrance day
- From: Bill Todd
- Re: Alpha remembrance day
- From: Glenn Everhart
- Re: Alpha remembrance day
- From: Bill Todd
- Re: Alpha remembrance day
- Prev by Date: Re: Alpha remembrance day
- Next by Date: Re: Alpha remembrance day
- Previous by thread: Re: Alpha remembrance day
- Next by thread: Re: Alpha remembrance day
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|