Re: FTP strangeness
- From: "Gremlin" <not-here@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2006 14:13:20 +1000
My reading of the RFC, possibly flawed, is that for the LIST command, 550 is
not one of the "valid" returns from the server (OVMS). Have I misread or
misunderstood this?
"Cluster-Karl" <karl.rohwedder@xxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1158316788.056323.186190@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Here is part of RFC 959:0
RFC 959 October
1985
File Transfer Protocol
550 Requested action not taken.
File unavailable (e.g., file not found, no access).
Btw. also the HGFTP client sends a 550 error.
regards Kalle
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: FTP strangeness
- From: briggs
- Re: FTP strangeness
- From: david20
- Re: FTP strangeness
- References:
- FTP strangeness
- From: Gremlin
- Re: FTP strangeness
- From: Cluster-Karl
- FTP strangeness
- Prev by Date: Re: Mozilla Thunderbird with VMS (was:Re: VMS MAIL: Will it ever join the 21st century?)
- Next by Date: Re: FREE DS10L Starting at 3:20pm Friday 15th September 06
- Previous by thread: Re: FTP strangeness
- Next by thread: Re: FTP strangeness
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|