Re: Alternate file types for RUN ?
- From: Arne Vajhøj <arne@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2006 20:45:12 -0400
JF Mezei wrote:
Stephen Hoffman wrote:Once the executable (main) image is activated, I would assume you
want everything else downstream to select that same architecture, right?
OK, point taken. While statically linked images would be fine
When did you last see a static linked image on VMS ?
Arne
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Alternate file types for RUN ?
- From: JF Mezei
- Re: Alternate file types for RUN ?
- References:
- Alternate file types for RUN ?
- From: JF Mezei
- Re: Alternate file types for RUN ?
- From: davidc
- Re: Alternate file types for RUN ?
- From: FredK
- Re: Alternate file types for RUN ?
- From: JF Mezei
- Re: Alternate file types for RUN ?
- From: Stephen Hoffman
- Re: Alternate file types for RUN ?
- From: JF Mezei
- Alternate file types for RUN ?
- Prev by Date: Re: Using Cobol when writing CGI's for the OSU web server.
- Next by Date: Re: Problem with apache 2.0.52 and mod perl 5.8.6
- Previous by thread: Re: Alternate file types for RUN ?
- Next by thread: Re: Alternate file types for RUN ?
- Index(es):
