Re: Banking security Was:PARSEC: SPAMMERS (not !)
- From: helbig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Phillip Helbig---remove CLOTHES to reply)
- Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2006 17:36:36 +0000 (UTC)
In article
<paul.sture.nospam-EF719B.15254626102006@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Paul
Sture <paul.sture.nospam@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
In article <JuGdnSvb0q3ICaLYnZ2dnUVZ_oudnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxx>,
Dave Froble <davef@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Paul Sture wrote:
Yep. Drifting slightly from the main topic, this brings us to to the
topic of identity theft. That happened to me nearly 20 years ago, and
VAXMAN's recent post here about similar brought back painful memories.
(Report a substantial loss of money to your bank, get asked to report it
to the police, then find yourself in an interview room being accused of
doing it with the aid of an accomplice. The bank's handling of the
matter made me seriously wonder if it was an "inside job" that they were
trying to cover up.)
This one's easy to see. The banking system is fatally flawed. Anyone
with your bank routing number and checking account number can initiate a
transfer. But the same information is on every check you write and send
to others. If the bank can get you to not file a claim against them,
then they don't have to replace the funds.
This is certainly not the case in Europe. Anyone who sends me money
needs this information. It is NOT enough for him to get money from my
account.
And some people wonder why I am reluctant to use a credit card over the
net. Yes, with a reputable company, I might be persuaded that a given
transaction may be secure, but what happens months later if those
details are still lying around on a system which happens to be
vulnerable to outside attack?
Yes, but even if you use it otherwise, the details can be on a computer
somewhere.
Actually, this is not a very big problem. Most credit-card purchases
online require only the data readable on the card. This is known to
many people, in particular anyone whom you have used your credit card to
pay. (Some, but not all, transactions require the extra number on the
back. This might be unknown to some, but not all, people whom you have
paid with your card.) However, unless they have a physical signature,
the credit-card company is NOT required to honour the transaction. So,
when you get your bill, before you pay it, check all the transactions.
If there is one which you didn't initiate, as the credit-card company to
cancel it. By law, they can only refuse if they can prove (via a
signature) that you did initiate the transaction (the burden of proof is
on them).
Yes, credit-card fraud does happen, but only because not everyone
notices the damage in time.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Banking security Was:PARSEC: SPAMMERS (not !)
- From: Jan-Erik Söderholm
- Re: Banking security Was:PARSEC: SPAMMERS (not !)
- From: Dave Froble
- Re: Banking security Was:PARSEC: SPAMMERS (not !)
- References:
- Re: PARSEC: SPAMMERS (not !)
- From: Peter Weaver
- Re: PARSEC: SPAMMERS (not !)
- From: Paul Sture
- Re: PARSEC: SPAMMERS (not !)
- From: Dave Froble
- Banking security Was:PARSEC: SPAMMERS (not !)
- From: Paul Sture
- Re: PARSEC: SPAMMERS (not !)
- Prev by Date: Re: NEW Email address
- Next by Date: Re: Itanium systems and DECCAMPUS
- Previous by thread: Re: Banking security Was:PARSEC: SPAMMERS (not !)
- Next by thread: Re: Banking security Was:PARSEC: SPAMMERS (not !)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|