Re: Purpose of uppercasing a RUN command ?
- From: norm.raphael@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2006 08:45:40 -0500
I have no particular insights, but ISTM that since it is possible to
SET PROCESS/PARSE=EXTENDED with ODS5, then this may guarantee a match.
JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote on 11/17/2006 06:12:44 AM:
Found this jewel in the SYS$SYSTEM directory:command,
$ run:
$ run 'f$edit("sys$system:tcpip$smtp_receiver.exe","upcase")'
Since this is written supposedly by people part of VMS engineering (or
perhaps "formerly part of" due to downsizing), I have to ask if there is
any justification for the above from a DCL/VMS engineering point of view.
Also found
$ set :=
Is this a strict equivalent to DELETE/SYMBOL/LOCAL SET ?
Another qestion: the same command procedure that has the fancy run
also has this:SYS$SYSTEM:)
$ serv_id = f$edit("tcpip$smtp","upcase")
$ serv_home = f$edit("sys$specific:[''serv_id']","upcase")
(these constructs are used in the TCPIP$*.COM files throughout
ways.
Were these files generated using some DCL generation tool that perhaps
converts the Tru64 scripts ?
I keep wondering why the TCPIP engineers wrote those procedures in those
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Purpose of uppercasing a RUN command ?
- From: david20
- Re: Purpose of uppercasing a RUN command ?
- From: Bart.Zorn@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Purpose of uppercasing a RUN command ?
- Prev by Date: Re: Mozilla + Java sanity check (speed tests)
- Next by Date: Re: Purpose of uppercasing a RUN command ?
- Previous by thread: Re: Purpose of uppercasing a RUN command ?
- Next by thread: Re: Purpose of uppercasing a RUN command ?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|