Re: SYSTEM-F-INFSMEM, insufficient dynamic memory
- From: Kilgallen@xxxxxxxxxxx (Larry Kilgallen)
- Date: 24 Nov 2006 07:30:34 -0600
In article <ZL-dneVAVaJPDfvYnZ2dnUVZ_o2dnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxx>, Dave Froble <davef@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
Malcolm Dunnett wrote:
"JF Mezei" <jfmezei.spamnot@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1fa61$4565302e$cef8887a$14243@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Downgrading to DECNET-5 requires a LOT more system resources (and diskI realize that, but I thought I should give it a try.
space).
Now why would you have such a lapse in common sense?
I realize there can be reasons to run Phase 5, but if you do not have
one of these reasons, my question is appropriate.
Getting experience running it seems like a good reason, taking time now
against the day when one of those business-critical needs arrives.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: SYSTEM-F-INFSMEM, insufficient dynamic memory
- From: Paul Sture
- Re: SYSTEM-F-INFSMEM, insufficient dynamic memory
- From: Dave Froble
- Re: SYSTEM-F-INFSMEM, insufficient dynamic memory
- From: Malcolm Dunnett
- Re: SYSTEM-F-INFSMEM, insufficient dynamic memory
- References:
- SYSTEM-F-INFSMEM, insufficient dynamic memory
- From: Malcolm Dunnett
- Re: SYSTEM-F-INFSMEM, insufficient dynamic memory
- From: Stephen Hoffman
- Re: SYSTEM-F-INFSMEM, insufficient dynamic memory
- From: Malcolm Dunnett
- Re: SYSTEM-F-INFSMEM, insufficient dynamic memory
- From: JF Mezei
- Re: SYSTEM-F-INFSMEM, insufficient dynamic memory
- From: Malcolm Dunnett
- Re: SYSTEM-F-INFSMEM, insufficient dynamic memory
- From: Dave Froble
- SYSTEM-F-INFSMEM, insufficient dynamic memory
- Prev by Date: Re: Batch Queue Jobs Stuck In Starting Status
- Next by Date: Re: SYSTEM-F-INFSMEM, insufficient dynamic memory
- Previous by thread: Re: SYSTEM-F-INFSMEM, insufficient dynamic memory
- Next by thread: Re: SYSTEM-F-INFSMEM, insufficient dynamic memory
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|