Re: US Military bans HTML in emails
- From: Arne Vajhøj <arne@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 02 Jan 2007 20:50:01 -0500
AEF wrote:
Arne Vajhøj wrote:David J Dachtera wrote:Bill Gunshannon wrote:There were some real bad incidents 3-5 years ago.Not in the real world. Good enough doesn't cut it when someone higher...until the(ir next) multi-billion-dollar outage due to malware. Then, the
than you says, "The corporate standard is MS Word."
higher-ups face turn-over while the workers bees burn the midnight oil to clean
up the mess.
No move from Windows then.
Now the MIS departments has tightened security.
You mean like requiring 6-character passwords to now be "complex"?
Yeah, that'll stop 'em!!! ;-)
OK, maybe they're actually doing some more useful things.
More as in:
min 8 characters
min 1 uppercase
min 1 lowercase
min 1 digit
min 1 punctuation
Or as in email scanners that removes all EXE, BAT etc. from attached
ZIP files in inbound email.
Arne
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: US Military bans HTML in emails
- From: AEF
- Re: US Military bans HTML in emails
- From: David J Dachtera
- Re: US Military bans HTML in emails
- References:
- Re: US Military bans HTML in emails
- From: David J Dachtera
- Re: US Military bans HTML in emails
- From: Bill Gunshannon
- Re: US Military bans HTML in emails
- From: David J Dachtera
- Re: US Military bans HTML in emails
- From: Arne Vajhøj
- Re: US Military bans HTML in emails
- From: AEF
- Re: US Military bans HTML in emails
- Prev by Date: Re: Connectivity to SQL Server from Existing COBOL Apps
- Next by Date: Re: Gee, as if I did not already know this ...
- Previous by thread: Re: US Military bans HTML in emails
- Next by thread: Re: US Military bans HTML in emails
- Index(es):