Re: More proof that global warming is a hoax ...



In article <45fb4ca3$0$176$157c6196@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Dr. Dweeb"
<spam@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

The evidence from the hard sciences (as distinct from climatology) is that
temperature fluctuations happen, have always happened, and will continue to
happen, independent of the existence of industrialised civilisations.

Yes, of course, no-one disputes this. This does not rule out the
possibility, however, that the increase of carbon dioxide in the air due
to burning of fossil fuels contributes an additional change to the
climate, global warming (though, since the Earth is complex, this
doesn't mean the same increase in temperature everywhere, and might even
mean a decrease on some places), and on a timescale shorter than most
natural variability.

It doesn't matter to the Earth or to life on Earth in the big picture.
It DOES matter to us, though. If the temperature increae is man-made,
then it makes sense to ameliorate its effect by decreasing the output of
carbon dioxide.

Every day in my professional life I hear people describe a symptom or event
(something melted/end-to-end performance has degraded over time), and then
postulate a solution (use less carbon fuel/buy more hardware) without ever
considering that in order for a solution to "work" it must be proved that it
will act on the cause and thus reverse the trend or stop the degradation.

That might be true, but people who don't know what they are talking
about who support a given hypothesis does not automatically rule out
that the hypothesis is true, since it might be supported by valid
evidence.

The biggest fool in the world can say the sun is shining, but that
doesn't make it dark out. The truth of a statement is unrelated to the
competence of the speaker.

Without being able to demonstrate the a causal relationship between event A
and result B, all postulated solutions are logically invalid - ie. just a
wild guess.

Of course. But that has no bearing on the important questions of
whether a) global warming is real, b) it is primarily man-made, c) is
caused by increased output of carbon dioxide and d) the trend can be
reversed or lessened in impact by decreasing carbon dioxide.

.



Relevant Pages

  • Global Whining vs. the Truth
    ... It had to be global warming. ... The world's most thorough historical temperature record is found ... carbon dioxide, mostly occurred after the Little Ice Age and prior to ... CO2 is also the byproduct of progress. ...
    (alt.politics.bush)
  • Re: comments guys
    ... The greenhouse effect of carbon dioxide has been know about since John ... ozone and methane that absorbed the thermal radiation emitted ... raising the temperature of the air near the surface. ... The Earth is being warmed by the Sun, ...
    (uk.sci.weather)
  • Re: How science is not done
    ... temperature in the geological record does not refute global warming. ... So present climate models cannot predict the future temperature, ... That carbon dioxide absorbs long-wave infrared, ...
    (sci.astro.amateur)
  • Re: When London is submerged and New York is awash...
    ... >The Carbon Dioxide Thermometer and the Cause of Global ... >natural carbon dioxide thermometer to global temperature ... >combined effects of cosmic rays, ... >from the calibration graph. ...
    (sci.electronics.design)
  • Re: Cooler assessment of climate obsession
    ... But the latest such scare - global warming - has ... the amount of carbon dioxide in the Earth's atmosphere ... from the sun and thus keep the planet warmer than it would otherwise ... So clearly carbon dioxide is only part of the global temperature ...
    (alt.politics)