Re: Suggestion for the VMS X-windows server
- From: "FredK" <fred.nospam@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2007 13:28:04 GMT
"Michael Kraemer" <M.Kraemer@xxxxxx> wrote in message
news:etiut3$g5n$01$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
FredK schrieb:
Not possible. 1) X11 does not know what the process is. All it knows is
the connection - which "might" know who the user is - and it might not be
local.
but if the server is running local, it is at least conceivable
that it cooperates with the OS when it runs out of resources.
It isn't clear to me that it has "run out of resources". Becomming
unresponsive doesn't meet the criteria. If the X server "runs out of
memory" --- it crashes (or sometimes if you are lucky it kills a
connection) - it doesn't just "slow down".
Now, it "could" be paging itself to death. Or it could be in some type of
event/refresh loop with Mozilla. Who knows.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Suggestion for the VMS X-windows server
- From: JF Mezei
- Re: Suggestion for the VMS X-windows server
- References:
- Suggestion for the VMS X-windows server
- From: JF Mezei
- Re: Suggestion for the VMS X-windows server
- From: FredK
- Re: Suggestion for the VMS X-windows server
- From: Michael Kraemer
- Suggestion for the VMS X-windows server
- Prev by Date: RE: Suggestion for the VMS X-windows server
- Next by Date: Re: Suggestion for the VMS X-windows server
- Previous by thread: Re: Suggestion for the VMS X-windows server
- Next by thread: Re: Suggestion for the VMS X-windows server
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|