Re: More proof that global warming is a hoax ...



Bill Todd wrote:
Dr. Dweeb wrote:
Bill Todd wrote:
Dr. Dweeb wrote:

...

Heck, they can't even explain precisely why electrical currents
occur in a generator.
No, but they have an *excellent* record of being able not only to
predict them but to use these predictions to make significant
improvements.
Unlike climatologists, who are batting 0 for 14, or worse.
I consider it rather unlikely that you have any clue whatsoever what
they are batting - it certainly sounds as if you are merely
regurgitating the most recent specific result that you heard about.

But by all means feel free to come up with the kind of comprehensive
review of climatological predictions that could justify that rather
sweeping generalization: demonstrating that kind of discipline
would be a unique event for your side of the discussion.


Why don't you just come up with one?

Because I'm not the one disputing the widely-accepted scientific
conclusions drawn from these studies and offering up completely
unsupported conspiracy theories about why that high level of
acceptance should be discounted.


I have not been able to find one reference suggesting that any current
models are able to predict the present from the known past. There are
plenty of scientists observing this fact. Some of my previous references
contain such observations.

One reference directly attributes the "closed circle" of climatology
modellers and suggests that the models predictive similarity is largely a
result of a comparative feedback loop between the different modellers.

I have not suggested a conspiracy theory.
Widely accepted != true (especially in the political field)

It's the Flat Earthers on whom the burden of proof now resides, Dweeb:
the rest of us have, albeit slowly, seen the light and moved on. You
can either move on with us, or at least stop actively standing in the
way and instead ask intelligent questions that might actually prove
useful (rather than offer up the kind of drivel you've been providing
and refuse to address the detailed refutations of it in equal detail),
or get rolled over.

You are pretty funny sometimes, but not often


- bill

Dweeb


.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: More proof that global warming is a hoax ...
    ... occur in a generator. ... Unlike climatologists, who are batting 0 for 14, or worse. ... review of climatological predictions that could justify that rather ...
    (comp.os.vms)
  • Re: More proof that global warming is a hoax ...
    ... occur in a generator. ... Unlike climatologists, who are batting 0 for 14, or worse. ... I consider it rather unlikely that you have any clue whatsoever what they are batting - it certainly sounds as if you are merely regurgitating the most recent specific result that you heard about. ... But by all means feel free to come up with the kind of comprehensive review of climatological predictions that could justify that rather sweeping generalization: demonstrating that kind of discipline would be a unique event for your side of the discussion. ...
    (comp.os.vms)
  • Re: More proof that global warming is a hoax ...
    ... occur in a generator. ... Unlike climatologists, who are batting 0 for 14, or worse. ... I consider it rather unlikely that you have any clue whatsoever what they are batting - it certainly sounds as if you are merely regurgitating the most recent specific result that you heard about. ... But by all means feel free to come up with the kind of comprehensive review of climatological predictions that could justify that rather sweeping generalization: demonstrating that kind of discipline would be a unique event for your side of the discussion. ...
    (comp.os.vms)
  • Re: More proof that global warming is a hoax ...
    ... occur in a generator. ... Unlike climatologists, who are batting 0 for 14, or worse. ... I consider it rather unlikely that you have any clue whatsoever what they are batting - it certainly sounds as if you are merely regurgitating the most recent specific result that you heard about. ... But by all means feel free to come up with the kind of comprehensive review of climatological predictions that could justify that rather sweeping generalization: demonstrating that kind of discipline would be a unique event for your side of the discussion. ...
    (comp.os.vms)
  • Re: More proof that global warming is a hoax ...
    ... occur in a generator. ... Unlike climatologists, who are batting 0 for 14, or worse. ... review of climatological predictions that could justify that rather ...
    (comp.os.vms)