Re: More proof that global warming is a hoax ...

Bill Todd wrote:

Maverick wrote:

Bill Todd wrote:

Maverick wrote:

Bill Todd wrote:

Dr. Dweeb wrote:

...

Heck, they can't even explain precisely why electrical currents
occur in a generator.



No, but they have an *excellent* record of being able not only to
predict them but to use these predictions to make significant
improvements.




Unlike climatologists, who are batting 0 for 14, or worse.




I consider it rather unlikely that you have any clue whatsoever what they are batting - it certainly sounds as if you are merely regurgitating the most recent specific result that you heard about.

But by all means feel free to come up with the kind of comprehensive review of climatological predictions that could justify that rather sweeping generalization: demonstrating that kind of discipline would be a unique event for your side of the discussion.



Guffaw!! When they can't even predict the weather, and worse they use computer models based on faulty assumptions, they call this a science??



Hey, you're welcome to come up with a credible compilation of reference data to support your babble as well, you know - don't feel you have to leave it up to Dweeb. Absent that, the fact that the large majority of people best qualified to assess the credibility of climate projections feel that there is real cause for corrective action to be taken means that your personal opinions on the subject won't get a great deal of respect from more objective observers.


The only babble comes from people in fear mode.


You mean like those your fellow-skeptic Dweeb keeps citing - you know, the ones (the latest three now by my count) that turn out (upon closer examination than flakes like you are apparently capable of) to be publicly and reasonably sure that human-caused global warming *is* indeed occurring?

You and Dweeb don't even pay attention to the sources you favor, it seems. No wonder you don't have a clue.

It is obvious that you don't want to read what was given to you. Any rational reasoning with you is beyond any hope.
I'm selling hard hats for those that are in fear.
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: More proof that global warming is a hoax ...
    ... occur in a generator. ... Unlike climatologists, who are batting 0 for 14, or worse. ... review of climatological predictions that could justify that rather ...
    (comp.os.vms)
  • Re: More proof that global warming is a hoax ...
    ... occur in a generator. ... Unlike climatologists, who are batting 0 for 14, or worse. ... review of climatological predictions that could justify that rather ...
    (comp.os.vms)
  • Re: More proof that global warming is a hoax ...
    ... occur in a generator. ... Unlike climatologists, who are batting 0 for 14, or worse. ... I consider it rather unlikely that you have any clue whatsoever what they are batting - it certainly sounds as if you are merely regurgitating the most recent specific result that you heard about. ... But by all means feel free to come up with the kind of comprehensive review of climatological predictions that could justify that rather sweeping generalization: demonstrating that kind of discipline would be a unique event for your side of the discussion. ...
    (comp.os.vms)
  • Re: More proof that global warming is a hoax ...
    ... occur in a generator. ... Unlike climatologists, who are batting 0 for 14, or worse. ... I consider it rather unlikely that you have any clue whatsoever what they are batting - it certainly sounds as if you are merely regurgitating the most recent specific result that you heard about. ... But by all means feel free to come up with the kind of comprehensive review of climatological predictions that could justify that rather sweeping generalization: demonstrating that kind of discipline would be a unique event for your side of the discussion. ...
    (comp.os.vms)
  • Re: More proof that global warming is a hoax ...
    ... occur in a generator. ... Unlike climatologists, who are batting 0 for 14, or worse. ... review of climatological predictions that could justify that rather ...
    (comp.os.vms)