Re: OT: Global warming update: Coldest April in 113 years ...
- From: koehler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Bob Koehler)
- Date: 16 Apr 2007 16:06:00 -0500
In article <evvvt8$pk$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, david20@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx writes:
The interpretations are just attempts to understand what the hell QM really
means. Newtonian mechanics gave a pictue of the universe which everyone could
agree on. GR similarly gives a picture everyone could agree on.
There is no agreed picture for QM just mathematical tools which work.
That's about as far from reality as I've seen. There are different
opinions about some details. Heck, I know of a man who won the
the Nobel Prize in Chemistry and doesn't agree with Newtonian
mechanics at macroscopic levels.
.
- References:
- Global warming update: Coldest April in 113 years ...
- From: ultradwc
- Re: Global warming update: Coldest April in 113 years ...
- From: Neil Rieck
- Re: Global warming update: Coldest April in 113 years ...
- From: Dave Froble
- Re: Global warming update: Coldest April in 113 years ...
- From: Bill Todd
- Re: Global warming update: Coldest April in 113 years ...
- From: Andrew
- Re: Global warming update: Coldest April in 113 years ...
- From: JF Mezei
- Re: Global warming update: Coldest April in 113 years ...
- From: genius
- OT: Global warming update: Coldest April in 113 years ...
- From: Doug Phillips
- Re: OT: Global warming update: Coldest April in 113 years ...
- From: AEF
- Global warming update: Coldest April in 113 years ...
- Prev by Date: Re: Democrats destroying America ...
- Next by Date: Re: Error Checking in DCL using $severity
- Previous by thread: Re: OT: Global warming update: Coldest April in 113 years ...
- Next by thread: Re: OT: Global warming update: Coldest April in 113 years ...
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|