Re: Itanium Performance tools
- From: Hein RMS van den Heuvel <heinvandenheuvel@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 27 Apr 2007 07:50:07 -0700
On Apr 27, 9:00 am, koeh...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Bob
Koehler) wrote:
In article <1331dhi6tv1e...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Mark Daniel <mark.dan...@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
What can be inferred from such a snapshot?
If you have sufficient RAM, then I'd raise the system working set
a little to see if the kernel faults go away.
BZZZZ....
Mark cut the MONI ALIGN screen a little short.
The header would have read: "ALIGNMENT FAULT STATISTICS"
Those faults are NOT page faults, but alignment fault... and a lot!
Increasing memory will have zero effect on this as you now surely
realize.
Cheers,
Hein.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Itanium Performance tools
- From: Bob Koehler
- Re: Itanium Performance tools
- References:
- Itanium Performance tools
- From: pinton@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Itanium Performance tools
- From: John Reagan
- Re: Itanium Performance tools
- From: Mark Daniel
- Re: Itanium Performance tools
- From: Bob Koehler
- Itanium Performance tools
- Prev by Date: Re: Medical software vendor says it won't support OS on Itanium-based servers
- Next by Date: Re: Medical software vendor says it won't support OS on Itanium-based servers
- Previous by thread: Re: Itanium Performance tools
- Next by thread: Re: Itanium Performance tools
- Index(es):