RE: numerical libraries on integrity
- From: "O'Brien Paddy" <Paddy.O'Brien@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 19:39:42 +1000
Sorry, I mis-wrote:
It may well still be on IA64 as DPML rather than CPML, and I
am sure that it should be as the Fortran or C compilers will
not work correctly (probably, other languages).
I should have said:
It may well still be on IA64 as DPML rather than CPML, and I
am sure that it should be as the linkage of .OBJs of Fortran or C
compiled code using these intrinsics would generate errors (probably,
other languages).
Regards, Paddy
***********************************************************************
Please consider the environment before printing this email.
"This electronic message and any attachments may contain privileged
and confidential information intended only for the use of the
addressees named above. If you are not the intended recipient of
this email, please delete the message and any attachment and advise
the sender. You are hereby notified that any use, dissemination,
distribution, reproduction of this email is prohibited.
If you have received the email in error, please notify TransGrid
immediately. Any views expressed in this email are those of the
individual sender except where the sender expressly and with
authority states them to be the views of TransGrid. TransGrid uses
virus-scanning software but excludes any liability for viruses
contained in any attachment."
***********************************************************************
.
- Prev by Date: Re: Apache on OpenVMS 7.2 Alpha
- Next by Date: Re: Making LIB$*_VM_PAGE Caller's-mode safe
- Previous by thread: Re: numerical libraries on integrity
- Next by thread: RE: numerical libraries on integrity
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|