Re: PLUG: PMAS

In article <f51cb9$478$1@xxxxxxxxx>,
helbig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Phillip Helbig---remove CLOTHES to reply) writes:
In article <1378bo75v2pl6a1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Mark Daniel
<mark.daniel@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

And I thought the SPAM load was moderating (silly me).

Looking for a specific e-mail I thought I should have received, I just
opened my PreciseMail Anti-SPAM quarrantined messages page to search for
it (without success). I don't do this often and haven't for a while
(obviously not since the last upgrade). Towards the top of the
2,967,263 byte report page is a (new to me) item "(Messages: 4605)".
That's four and one half thousand quarrantined SPAM in the past 14 days!
This is something like 328 per day!!

That seems about average. I've resorted to using ZEN.SPAMHAUS.ORG as an
RBL. That gets rid of the lion's share.

So, how bad does it have to get before I can expect people to start
looking at my suggestion for a social solution rather than technical
solutions that may hide the problem but certainly don't reduce it or
the load it puts on the system?

bill

--
Bill Gunshannon | de-moc-ra-cy (di mok' ra see) n. Three wolves
bill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx | and a sheep voting on what's for dinner.
University of Scranton |
Scranton, Pennsylvania | #include <std.disclaimer.h>
.

Quantcast