Re: PLUG: PMAS
- From: bill@xxxxxxxxxxx (Bill Gunshannon)
- Date: 19 Jun 2007 12:34:03 GMT
In article <f56v23$hfk$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
david20@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx writes:
In article <5dnrfgF32rpkjU2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, bill@xxxxxxxxxxx (Bill Gunshannon) writes:
In article <op.tt4d52rn8vlggw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
"Tom Linden" <tom-remove@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
On Sun, 17 Jun 2007 01:05:55 -0700, P. Sture
<paul.sture.nospam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
In article <1378kfui13fk00@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,Why not be your own ISP? I am. My 'ISP' only provides me with a T1 pipe.
Mark Daniel <mark.daniel@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Bill Gunshannon wrote:
In article <f51cb9$478$1@xxxxxxxxx>,reply)
helbig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Phillip Helbig---remove CLOTHES to
writes:just
In article <1378bo75v2pl6a1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Mark Daniel
<mark.daniel@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
And I thought the SPAM load was moderating (silly me).
Looking for a specific e-mail I thought I should have received, I
foropened my PreciseMail Anti-SPAM quarrantined messages page to search
days!it (without success). I don't do this often and haven't for a while
(obviously not since the last upgrade). Towards the top of the
2,967,263 byte report page is a (new to me) item "(Messages: 4605)".
That's four and one half thousand quarrantined SPAM in the past 14
anThis is something like 328 per day!!
That seems about average. I've resorted to using ZEN.SPAMHAUS.ORG as
RBL. That gets rid of the lion's share.
I've just started using that zen.spamhaus.org as well, and the spam on
my VMS system has dropped significantly as a result.
So, how bad does it have to get before I can expect people to start
looking at my suggestion for a social solution rather than technical
solutions that may hide the problem but certainly don't reduce it or
the load it puts on the system?
bill
Isn't this a little like suggesting a social solution to the problem of
crime :-) I'd guess that as long as there is profit to be made there
will be such activities.
I have a telephone answering machine primarily to screen tele-marketers.
Best AU$50 I ever spent. But the marketers will continue to call as
long as people respond to those calls (with interest, dollars, etc.)
Those who wish to speak to me leave a message (or I pick-up). Not had a
single message from a marketer or charity asking me to call them back.
FWIW, I've discontinued my land line and survive with a cell phone at
the moment. That's obviously not an option for everyone, but it's been
effective for me. My snail-mail box is now under attack, but that's
still nowhere near as bad as it was in the UK a decade ago.
The solution surely will be technological, perhaps digital signatures
and associated PKI, to reduce the effectiveness of general SPAMing thus
reserving the activity for specialised crime rather than the general
mugging we all endure now.
My ISP has recently tightened things up, as a couple of months ago the
spam volume dropped. Unfortunately, I believe I lost some valid emails
as well :-(
About 18 months ago they implemented SMTP authentication, but I don't
think they were enforcing it for quite a while.
The latest development is that the appear to be enforcing the use of my
registered address in the From: field. Until recently, I could happily
cc a news group posting via email using the munged .nospam sending
address you see above, but now that fails unless I use my real address
(a bit more research needed here to confirm this theory).
Not what I want to keep my real address munged for news groups, but a
pretty minor inconvenience if it really does stop zombies connected to
my ISP from spewing spam.
So I run my own DNS and Mail, in fact, it runs on each node under
loadbroker.
You could do the same even with DSL.
How does your running your own ISP fix the email for the guy who wants
to do business with you but his ISP is BLed? he will end out taking
his business to someone who runs as shoddy an email system as his own.
Talk about the mediocre winning the battle.
But, let me throw this out for consideration. You don't have to
answer publicly, just give it some thought. How many customers
do you have? Wouldn't it be better for all concerned if you could
establish a trust relationship such that you could know with 100%
certainty that all of their emails to you and all of yours to them
would get thru? If you knew that all of your existing customers
had a guaranteed pipe into your system wouldn't filtering for new
potential customers be easier than trying to filter for SPAM?
Keywords: PLI PL/I PL1 PL/1 PL-I PL-1 PLM SPL "Subset G"
How much SPAM is likely to match that?
What's that a keyword for every customer ? That's really going to scale.
How do you draw that conclusion? Tom deals in PLI Compilers. Every
customer is going to be looking for the stuff in the same class of
keywords. Now, if you're Sears or Kmart this method may not work well,
but then, email isn't likely to be their primary method of communicating
with customers, either.
bill
--
Bill Gunshannon | de-moc-ra-cy (di mok' ra see) n. Three wolves
bill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx | and a sheep voting on what's for dinner.
University of Scranton |
Scranton, Pennsylvania | #include <std.disclaimer.h>
.
- References:
- PLUG: PMAS
- From: Mark Daniel
- Re: PLUG: PMAS
- From: Phillip Helbig---remove CLOTHES to reply
- Re: PLUG: PMAS
- From: Bill Gunshannon
- Re: PLUG: PMAS
- From: Mark Daniel
- Re: PLUG: PMAS
- From: P. Sture
- Re: PLUG: PMAS
- From: Tom Linden
- Re: PLUG: PMAS
- From: Bill Gunshannon
- PLUG: PMAS
- Prev by Date: Re: PLUG: PMAS
- Next by Date: Re: OpenVMS hobbyist license woes
- Previous by thread: Re: PLUG: PMAS
- Next by thread: Re: PLUG: PMAS
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|