Re: OpenVMS - When downtime is not an option
- From: Rich Jordan <jordan@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2007 11:17:07 -0700
On Jun 21, 1:00 pm, "FredK" <fred.nos...@xxxxxxx> wrote:
"Cydrome Leader" <prese...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:f5d12c$6hv$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
P. Sture <paul.sture.nos...@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Oh come on you guys. For once be thrilled. HP shows off VMS. There were
VMS guys there (recognize them?). OpenVMS was not only mentioned first, it
was back online first, it wasn't an "Oh by the way". It wasn't a SAN
failover it was a data center failover. It was cool.
Sheesh.
Damn straight. Every little bit of recognition and publicity helps.
Now we want more!
Rich
.
- References:
- OpenVMS - When downtime is not an option
- From: IanMiller
- Re: OpenVMS - When downtime is not an option
- From: Bill Gunshannon
- Re: OpenVMS - When downtime is not an option
- From: Bob Koehler
- Re: OpenVMS - When downtime is not an option
- From: Bill Gunshannon
- Re: OpenVMS - When downtime is not an option
- From: David Turner, Island Computers
- Re: OpenVMS - When downtime is not an option
- From: IanMiller
- Re: OpenVMS - When downtime is not an option
- From: Bill Gunshannon
- Re: OpenVMS - When downtime is not an option
- From: P. Sture
- Re: OpenVMS - When downtime is not an option
- From: Cydrome Leader
- Re: OpenVMS - When downtime is not an option
- From: FredK
- OpenVMS - When downtime is not an option
- Prev by Date: Re: OpenVMS - When downtime is not an option
- Next by Date: Re: dns woes (ucx5.3, vms 7.3-1)
- Previous by thread: Re: OpenVMS - When downtime is not an option
- Next by thread: Re: OpenVMS - When downtime is not an option
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|