Re: Is VMS losing the Financial Sector, also?
- From: "P. Sture" <paul.sture.nospam@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2007 10:38:10 +0200
In article <Qwmji.3514$Np2.127@trnddc07>, John Santos <john@xxxxxxx>
wrote:
The answer, of course, is that a system exposed to a virus or an unpatched
exploit can get hacked anyway, no matter how competent the administrator.
Keeping up on patches and A/V is part of the job of the administrator.
But there is a race condition. What if the bad guy attacks before the
O/S vendor knows about the exploit, or the A/V vendor designs, implements
and distributes a test for it? Then you're up the creek. What are the
chances of this happening? Obviously, the more viruses and serious O/S
bugs, the greater the odds.
One problem there is that certain M$ patches have broken things,
sometimes quite seriously. This can lead to a certain reticence to apply
patches in a timely fashion.
--
Paul Sture
.
- References:
- RE: Is VMS losing the Financial Sector, also?
- From: Main, Kerry
- Re: Is VMS losing the Financial Sector, also?
- From: Bill Gunshannon
- Re: Is VMS losing the Financial Sector, also?
- From: Mark Berryman
- Re: Is VMS losing the Financial Sector, also?
- From: Bill Gunshannon
- Re: Is VMS losing the Financial Sector, also?
- From: John Santos
- RE: Is VMS losing the Financial Sector, also?
- Prev by Date: Re: XML for VMS
- Next by Date: Re: XMODEM for VMS
- Previous by thread: Re: Is VMS losing the Financial Sector, also?
- Next by thread: Re: Is VMS losing the Financial Sector, also?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|