Re: X11 in a browser?
- From: Mark Daniel <mark.daniel@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 04:40:04 +1030
Tom Linden wrote:
On Sun, 18 Nov 2007 08:02:06 -0800, Mark Daniel <mark.daniel@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Larry Kilgallen wrote:
In article <fhp4vi$bph$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, david20@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx writes:
In article <473F4E4A.5040201@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "Richard B. Gilbert" <rgilbert88@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
Since the user could almost certainly get PC software that will handle X windows for $400-$600 that's probably the way to go. If he needs fifty or a hundred copies of the PC software, that could get a little expensive and it might actually be worth writing a web interface.
Alternatively if the user is not averse to using public domain software on his
PCs then he could use the free Xming X windows software see
http://sourceforge.net/projects/xmng
and
http://www.straightrunning.com/XmingNotes/
What if the customer needs some third alternative to:
a) pay money
b) get it for free
? :-)
With Xming you can do both/either. Note the donation link
http://www.straightrunning.com/XmingNotes/#sect-16
(In fact it would appear you cannot obtain the latest release without donating!)
Seriously ... I evaluated the Cygwin/X package some time ago and found it unusable for my purposes. I have been using X-Win32
http://www.starnet.com/products/xwin32/
with great satisfaction for some time now but an alternative, which licence doesn't regularly expire, would be serious contender. I just downloaded the Xming package, have installed it, and am composing the VMS Mozilla newsreader reply using it as the X-Window Server.
First impressions: fast, lightweight, stable (at least it hasn't crashed yet with five DECterms and one Mozilla running; I also ran up DECwindows Mail, clock, etc., just to check) and seems to be handling the keyboard mapping from PC to VT-style for TPU., etc., adequately (with a little xmodmap-ing in my LOGIN.COM).
Mark, have you had occasion to compare it to eXcursion, for which I have
had a number of DECterms, emacs and dbg running without problem through
SSH connection?
I haven't Tom. I'm wasn't necessarily looking to replace X-Win32. It's becoming more capable and stable with each release - quite acceptable these days. It's always useful to have another way to accomplish the same objective though. Particularly when it's basically costless :-)
My only gripe so far (and this is one that also criticises VMS' 'detached' application creation infrastructure) is the lack of what I would call a real application launcher (X-Win32's is superb). It's a bit of a pain SSHing to the VMS box to launch (detached) DECterms and having to maintain them for applications such as Mozilla. Still, with a little judicous command-prompt batch programming that might be made less irksome.
If there's any interest I'll report back after using it for a period.
--
In science it often happens that scientists say, "You know that's a really good argument; my position is mistaken," and then they would actually change their minds and you never hear that old view from them again. They really do it. It doesn't happen as often as it should, because scientists are human and change is sometimes painful. But it happens every day. I cannot recall the last time someting like that happened in politics or religion.
[Carl Sagan; The Demon Haunted World]
--
If you want to save your child from polio, you can pray or you can inoculate.
[Carl Sagan; A Demon Haunted World]
.
- References:
- X11 in a browser?
- From: Walter Kuhn
- Re: X11 in a browser?
- From: Bob Koehler
- Re: X11 in a browser?
- From: sean
- Re: X11 in a browser?
- From: Richard B. Gilbert
- Re: X11 in a browser?
- From: david20
- Re: X11 in a browser?
- From: Larry Kilgallen
- Re: X11 in a browser?
- From: Mark Daniel
- Re: X11 in a browser?
- From: Tom Linden
- X11 in a browser?
- Prev by Date: Re: X11 in a browser?
- Next by Date: Re: Wireless. PCMCIA etc.?
- Previous by thread: Re: X11 in a browser?
- Next by thread: Re: X11 in a browser?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|