Re: 20+ year old encrypted source code
- From: JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2007 17:29:27 -0500
Bill Gunshannon wrote:
I realize that, I was just countering the notion that early BASIC's
wasted valuable resources on something like encryiption.
If it were "tokenised" (aka: parsed source code to make the interpreter's job easier), you would still be able to see textual constants inside the jibberish. (aka: the "Hello World" in "print "Hello World") would still be readable inside the binary file.
.
- References:
- Re: 20+ year old encrypted source code
- From: JF Mezei
- Re: 20+ year old encrypted source code
- From: Richard B. Gilbert
- Re: 20+ year old encrypted source code
- From: Arne Vajhøj
- Re: 20+ year old encrypted source code
- From: Bill Gunshannon
- Re: 20+ year old encrypted source code
- From: Bill Gunshannon
- Re: 20+ year old encrypted source code
- Prev by Date: Re: NASA gets SGI 2048-core Itanium 2 supercomputer
- Next by Date: Re: Singapore Server Rescue
- Previous by thread: Re: 20+ year old encrypted source code
- Next by thread: Re: 20+ year old encrypted source code
- Index(es):