Re: Proof that macintosh is better than VMS

On Mar 11, 9:23 am, koeh...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Bob
Koehler) wrote:
In article <47d58fcf$0$1443$c3e8...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, JF Mezei <jfmezei.spam...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:



However, prior to the draw, even if you knew the full configuration of
the machine, balls and aerodynamic properties of the chamber and the fan
blowing in it, you cannot predict the exact position of the rotating
chamber at time of start, the exact time difference between start of
rotation and the moment they drop the balls into the chamber, and the
exact moment when some human pushes a button to get a ball to come out.
So even if physics, aerodynamics and others sciences can explain the
movement of balls in the machine, no human has sufficient information to
have all the variables and thus, the outcome is random at the human level.

The random outcome of quantum mechanical behaviour is not a mere
limitation of human capability.

You are confusing quantum mechanics math with reality. If you mean
that the mathematics of quantum mechanics is not concerned with
resolving apparent randomness, then you are correct. You might want to
look into the de Broglie-Bohm theory, more recently called Bohmian
Mechanics.
.