Re: OT: Universal healthcare in England failing - boy dies !
- From: AEF <spamsink2001@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 17:04:45 -0700 (PDT)
On Mar 12, 7:51 pm, bradhamilton <bradhamil...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Well, Bob. I haven't heard from you. What was that you were saying
about "liberals" not willing to answer your points (or something like
that)?
He's a troll. He never answers from that (or any other) email address.
Please don't feed the trolls (PDFTT!)
So if he really doesn't believe what he's writing, what it the
motivation?
He seems to be an evangelist to me, but maybe you're right. I can't
see going
through such efforts just to get a long thread like this going, but
I'm not him.
But discussions like this are useful for me and others to be forced to
think about these things and construct arguments about them. Like when
Einstein kept pestering Bohr et al. about the uncertainty principle
and "spooky action at a distance" and such. Bohr acknowledged that it
was useful to progress with QM and respected Einstein greatly and
considered him his friend.
AEF
OK.
.
- References:
- Re: OT: Universal healthcare in England failing - boy dies !
- From: AEF
- Re: OT: Universal healthcare in England failing - boy dies !
- From: bradhamilton
- Re: OT: Universal healthcare in England failing - boy dies !
- Prev by Date: Re: OT: Proof that macintosh is better than VMS
- Next by Date: Re: Proof that macintosh is better than VMS
- Previous by thread: Re: OT: Universal healthcare in England failing - boy dies !
- Next by thread: Re: OT: Universal healthcare in England failing - boy dies !
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
