Re: Proof that macintosh is better than VMS
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2008 23:54:06 -0800
JF Mezei wrote:
(snip of Michelson interferometer diagram)
Considering the wavelength of light, I doubt very much that you can
setup a rig with mirrors where the A-B-D path is *exactly* the same
length as the A-C-D path, down to a point where you may need to consider
coriolis effect due to rotation of the earth.
Getting the paths equal isn't hard. If you use a light source
with a short coherence length (ordinary light bulb) you only get
interference when they are very close. Also, look into optical
gyroscopes which measure the change in interference as the system
rotates.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ring_laser_gyroscope
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fibre_optic_gyroscope
-- glen
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Proof that macintosh is better than VMS
- From: JF Mezei
- Re: Proof that macintosh is better than VMS
- References:
- OT: Proof that macintosh is better than VMS
- From: JF Mezei
- Re: Proof that macintosh is better than VMS
- From: John Vottero
- Re: Proof that macintosh is better than VMS
- From: Doug Phillips
- Re: Proof that macintosh is better than VMS
- From: Bob Koehler
- Re: Proof that macintosh is better than VMS
- From: Bill Gunshannon
- Re: Proof that macintosh is better than VMS
- From: AEF
- Re: Proof that macintosh is better than VMS
- From: david20
- Re: Proof that macintosh is better than VMS
- From: david20
- Re: Proof that macintosh is better than VMS
- From: AEF
- Re: Proof that macintosh is better than VMS
- From: JF Mezei
- OT: Proof that macintosh is better than VMS
- Prev by Date: Re: Microvax II + 9-Track
- Next by Date: Re: Peak cpu values in T4 different from ECP
- Previous by thread: Re: Proof that macintosh is better than VMS
- Next by thread: Re: Proof that macintosh is better than VMS
- Index(es):