Re: Proof that macintosh is better than VMS
- From: JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2008 04:12:40 -0400
Lets say a photon isn't a round sphere, but rather a flat disk. And it
rotates in 3d while travelling.
When it hits the glass, the decision on whether it bounces off or
penetrates the glass might depend on whether the disk is falling flat
against the glass (to big to fit between the cracks), or if it is in an
orientation that makes it thin and allow it to slip through between 2
atoms easily.
To you and me, it may be totally random because we can't see this, but
it doesn't mean that the photon doesn't react in a very logical way when
it hits glass (or water, chrome etc etc).
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- OT: Proof that macintosh is better than VMS
- From: JF Mezei
- Re: Proof that macintosh is better than VMS
- From: John Vottero
- Re: Proof that macintosh is better than VMS
- From: Doug Phillips
- Re: Proof that macintosh is better than VMS
- From: Bob Koehler
- Re: Proof that macintosh is better than VMS
- From: Bill Gunshannon
- Re: Proof that macintosh is better than VMS
- From: AEF
- Re: Proof that macintosh is better than VMS
- From: david20
- Re: Proof that macintosh is better than VMS
- From: david20
- Re: Proof that macintosh is better than VMS
- From: AEF
- Re: Proof that macintosh is better than VMS
- From: JF Mezei
- Re: Proof that macintosh is better than VMS
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- OT: Proof that macintosh is better than VMS
- Prev by Date: Re: Peak cpu values in T4 different from ECP
- Next by Date: Re: Another WSIT triumph?
- Previous by thread: Re: Proof that macintosh is better than VMS
- Next by thread: Re: Proof that macintosh is better than VMS
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|