Re: Proof that macintosh is better than VMS
- From: koehler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Bob Koehler)
- Date: 17 Mar 2008 09:37:17 -0600
In article <47dd958d$0$3931$c3e8da3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
Considering the wavelength of light, I doubt very much that you can
setup a rig with mirrors where the A-B-D path is *exactly* the same
length as the A-C-D path, down to a point where you may need to consider
coriolis effect due to rotation of the earth.
There are professionals who do this and account for much smaller
errors than material streching due to stresses from coriolis affects.
.
- References:
- OT: Proof that macintosh is better than VMS
- From: JF Mezei
- Re: Proof that macintosh is better than VMS
- From: John Vottero
- Re: Proof that macintosh is better than VMS
- From: Doug Phillips
- Re: Proof that macintosh is better than VMS
- From: Bob Koehler
- Re: Proof that macintosh is better than VMS
- From: Bill Gunshannon
- Re: Proof that macintosh is better than VMS
- From: AEF
- Re: Proof that macintosh is better than VMS
- From: david20
- Re: Proof that macintosh is better than VMS
- From: david20
- Re: Proof that macintosh is better than VMS
- From: AEF
- Re: Proof that macintosh is better than VMS
- From: JF Mezei
- OT: Proof that macintosh is better than VMS
- Prev by Date: Re: Can a MicroVAX 3100 run on 208V?
- Next by Date: Re: Converting Real numbers with IEEE format to G_Float format
- Previous by thread: Re: Proof that macintosh is better than VMS
- Next by thread: Re: Proof that macintosh is better than VMS
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|