Re: "Network tape drive" for VMS
- From: Albrecht Schlosser <ajs567@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2008 12:40:49 +0200
Tom Linden wrote:
On Thu, 17 Jul 2008 07:01:15 -0700, Tom Linden <tom@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Thu, 17 Jul 2008 06:11:14 -0700, Albrecht Schlosser <ajs567@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:You didn't say whether you had fibre or not, but I just checked
Is there anything available that could be called a
"network tape drive" that is supported with
(a) OpenVMS / Alpha 7.3-2
(b) OpenVMS / I64, 8.2 or 8.3 ff. ?
The reason is to have the backup tape drive separated from the
server for easier access to change the backup tapes.
Please don't ask, why would you want to do that. It's simply
because of a user's request. And this should *not* be another
VMS server (cluster node) with a tape drive ;-)
If you have fibre, put it on a Modular Data Router
an MDR will run you ~$500. You can get a fibre switch for less
than $300 and HBAs can be had for $20-40 each. This is your
best solution, allowing you to put the tape unit as far away as
you please from the computer room
Thanks to all who replied. Here's a summary of what I read so far.
Fibre channel seems the way to go, if at all. It's supported on
both platforms neede, including OpenVMS/Alpha 7.3-2. The server in
question doesn't have FC yet, but maybe it could be upgraded.
However, I can't believe the prices above. Are these for supported
configurations? I had a price of about 4000 EUR (ca. $ 6000 ?) in
mind for a FC adapter for Itanium, maybe together with or additional
to a FC switch that would be needed. I'll have to check that further.
iSCSI seems not to be supported yet. I found something about a
demonstration kit for V. 8.3-1H1 (I64 only). Seems to be supported
with 8.4 at best. Does anybody know more?
Also thanks for all the interesting comments regarding DC and
backup management. For the original question, there are two points
(1) The "users" are not necessarily personnel in the same company
as the IT people. Today, the server is in the users's office, but
they complain about the noise, and the server can't be cooled
appropriately. Thus the idea of moving it to the DC/server room.
The IT of the other company would host the server, but they wouldn't
like to do daily maintenance jobs like changing tapes :-(
(2) Everything is a question of costs. There is no cluster, and
having another server in the office to serve the backup tape
would not help to remove the server from the office.