Re: [RBL] Current status?
- From: koehler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Bob Koehler)
- Date: 4 Sep 2008 11:26:02 -0500
In article <gLRvk.272770$TT4.161515@attbi_s22>, "John E. Malmberg" <wb8tyw@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
If it is not supposed to send e-mail, and it attempts to, don't you
think someone should find out why?
We've had a lot of problems deploying COTS products that send
out notifications via email, from systems that the security folks
think shouldn't be "mail servers".
So "supposed to" is in the eye of the beholder.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RBL] Current status?
- From: David J Dachtera
- Re: [RBL] Current status?
- From: Bill Gunshannon
- Re: [RBL] Current status?
- References:
- Re: [RBL] Current status?
- From: John E. Malmberg
- Re: [RBL] Current status?
- From: John E. Malmberg
- Re: [RBL] Current status?
- Prev by Date: Re: DEFCON 16 and Hacking OpenVMS
- Next by Date: Re: OT: Carly speeks at convetion
- Previous by thread: Re: [RBL] Current status?
- Next by thread: Re: [RBL] Current status?
- Index(es):