Re: INIT params for disk to build on-disk save sets
- From: AEF <spamsink2001@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 12:15:09 -0700 (PDT)
On Oct 23, 4:49 pm, Hein RMS van den Heuvel
<heinvandenheu...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Oct 23, 4:27 pm, AEF <spamsink2...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
:
I will primarily have just one large file on this disk at any given:
disk? (For those of you who are too young to remember, these disks are
2 GB in size. Or more accurately: 4110480 TOTAL BLOCKS.)
I'm old enough... 7200 rpm, narrow scsi, big then, very small now.
You are better of with a $99 500GB USB drive if you can hook that up!
OK, so I was thinking of large value for /CLUSTER.
Yeah sure... like 512.
large value for /EXTEND, maybe 10000
Certainly, line 64000
Wait a minute. Doesn't this mean that the extend value would be
512*64000=32768000 blocks? This is larger than the disk.
Maybe I should leave the EXTENSION value at its default of 5 and
specify a huge cluster size of 10000, 20000, or 40000 (has to be .LE.
the size of the disk, which is 4110480 blocks).
BTW, the File Applications manual says that a cluster may or may not
be contiguous. I assume this means that a cluster may or may not span
two adjacent tracks, no?
small value for /HEADERSSure... 100?
On further though, I may as well leave it at its default of 16.
medium value for /MAXIMUM_FILES
Sure... 1000?
Someone pointed out that the index file bitmap contains one bit per
file header so that I may as well use 4096. It shouldn't really matter
much.
And maybe add /INDEX=BEG
OK.
The qualifier /INDEX=BEGINNING means the outermost cylinders, right?
Just curious.
What do y'all think? Is it even worth bothering with?
I would, but I would not expect much from it other then no longer
having the think whether I should have tweaked it some. :-). Piece of
mind.
Well, I think the EXTENSION value (measured in blocks) is important,
at least.
Hein.
Thanks!
AEF
.
- References:
- INIT params for disk to build on-disk save sets
- From: AEF
- Re: INIT params for disk to build on-disk save sets
- From: AEF
- Re: INIT params for disk to build on-disk save sets
- From: AEF
- Re: INIT params for disk to build on-disk save sets
- From: Hein RMS van den Heuvel
- INIT params for disk to build on-disk save sets
- Prev by Date: Re: What does this mean?
- Next by Date: Re: INIT params for disk to build on-disk save sets
- Previous by thread: Re: INIT params for disk to build on-disk save sets
- Next by thread: Re: INIT params for disk to build on-disk save sets
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|