Re: "Shanghai Stock Exchange" and OpenVMS
- From: "Richard B. Gilbert" <rgilbert88@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 10:15:26 -0500
AEF wrote:
On Jan 28, 1:46 am, Michael Kraemer <M.Krae...@xxxxxx> wrote:Unix was meant to be easy to type! Ease of learning it was definitely secondary if it was considered at all!!AEF schrieb:
New! From IDG books: DOS for Dummkopfs.That should be "Dummköpfe", but Umlauts are not everybody's
strong points.
That's what it is in English. I even checked at www.webster.com. Do
you expect me to write "Deutschland" instead of "Germany"? "Republique
francaise" instead of "France"?
Back to the point: Neither VMS Help nor Unix man pages
are appropriate for learning either OS from scratch.
The VMS User's manual is.
They are meant as a reminder for forgotten keywords and such.
If you have no clue about those OS, both help systems
are next to useless.
I had to work on VMS before I knew Unix and found
VMS, its filesystem and its HELP less intuitive.
So Unix was a progress.
I find the man pages dense and visually difficult to read (an example
of poor typography). And the ones I have usually show several versions
of the same command with the differences specified in the name of the
command via different paths. You know: path1/cp, path2/cp, etc., where
path1 and path2 may be very similar in appearance. Which one is the
one I will be running if I just specify cp? (This is intuitive?)
Someone at work showed me a website which reformmated the man pages
into something much easier to read. Can't be just me who finds the
original man pages visually difficult to read.
Also, I find English words much more intuitive and actually mostly, if
not partly, self explanatory. I don't find that to be the case for 1-
and 2-letter commands and options. VMS commands and qualifiers and
keywords and such are mostly self-evident as to what they more or less
do or specify, aside from the fine details.
VMS terms are like those in photography: What does the enlarger do? It
enlarges (the image)! What does the developer do? It develops film or
photographic paper. What does the focusing knob do? What does the stop
bath do? It stops the developer from developing. The fixer bath
"fixes" the film or print so that you can turn on the light without
destroying the image. And then there's the print washer and the print
dryer. Can you guess what they do? Now suppose they were instead named
by Unix type abbreviations. You'd have no or little idea what any of
them are or do without looking them up. Now, admittedly, the existing
photographic terms aren't fully self-explanatory, but at least you get
a pretty good idea of what they do (well, to varying degrees). OK,
"lens" isn't self-explanatory at all; you have to learn that one! And
"focusing" may be a challenge for some.
If you are at all familiar with Unix, you know that the early pioneers worked with some very primitive teletype equipment, specifically, the model 33. Those who have used the model 33 will understand, intuitively, the brevity of Unix commands. For those who have not, the model 33 required, by modern standards, extreme force to operate the keyboard. There was no tiny switch underneath the key cap; it was levers, wheels and gears! There was only ONE case, uppercase! I believe it was automagically converted to lower case and you had to "escape" anything you wanted left in uppercase.
There is no reason other than tradition to continue this barbarous practice but tradition is a powerful force.
Well, I'd think the photographic terms, as they currently exist, areA unix user need not concern himself with the underlying storage media!
more intuitive, right?
The file systems are another story. I haven't learned how you can have
different disks in the same single file system. As a user I suppose
that's fine, but in VMS the system manager can set up logical names to
reference directories so that the user (or even the programmer in many
cases) need not be concerned with what the underlying device is.
VMS users are accustomed to seeing physical devices, each with its own filesystem.
In Unix, there is only ONE filesystem starting a "/" or the "root". The actual files may be on the one and only disk or on several different disks. Physical disks are mounted at "mount points" which look, to VMS users, like directories. The directories used as mount points are normally empty since mounting a device on that mount point will overlay any directory entries present. The Unix user need not concern himself with the details of which device(s) actually contain his files.
Being intuitive is not the end-all be-all. What can you do with the OS
is also important. Of course we _were_ discussing looking stuff up,
but you referred to "progress", which opens up a whole new can of
worms.
Some things in Unix I find very cool, like using output of one program
as input for another.
VMS can do that too! Old line VMS people tend not to use it much but it's there. See HELP PIPE.
But VMS has some very cool things, too.
Indeed it does. Starting with using English words like COPY, PRINT, DELETE, CREATE. . . etc, as commands. It requires a little more typing but that is not a hardship for anyone who has learned to type and is not using a Model 33 teletype.
It makes the commands easy to remember. The syntax is standard. Rather than having each program parse its own command line, DCL does it for you. AIRC, you call a subroutine that returns the neatly parsed bits and pieces. I didn't use it much. It was easier to have the program prompt for the information it needed; if it needed anything.
<snip>
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: "Shanghai Stock Exchange" and OpenVMS
- From: Bill Gunshannon
- Re: "Shanghai Stock Exchange" and OpenVMS
- References:
- "Shanghai Stock Exchange" and OpenVMS
- From: Neil Rieck
- Re: [Info-vax] "Shanghai Stock Exchange" and OpenVMS
- From: Bill Gunshannon
- Re: "Shanghai Stock Exchange" and OpenVMS
- From: AEF
- Re: "Shanghai Stock Exchange" and OpenVMS
- From: Bill Gunshannon
- Re: "Shanghai Stock Exchange" and OpenVMS
- From: AEF
- Re: "Shanghai Stock Exchange" and OpenVMS
- From: Bill Gunshannon
- Re: "Shanghai Stock Exchange" and OpenVMS
- From: AEF
- Re: "Shanghai Stock Exchange" and OpenVMS
- From: Bill Gunshannon
- Re: "Shanghai Stock Exchange" and OpenVMS
- From: AEF
- Re: "Shanghai Stock Exchange" and OpenVMS
- From: Bill Gunshannon
- Re: "Shanghai Stock Exchange" and OpenVMS
- From: AEF
- Re: "Shanghai Stock Exchange" and OpenVMS
- From: Richard B. Gilbert
- Re: "Shanghai Stock Exchange" and OpenVMS
- From: AEF
- Re: "Shanghai Stock Exchange" and OpenVMS
- From: Bill Gunshannon
- Re: "Shanghai Stock Exchange" and OpenVMS
- From: AEF
- Re: "Shanghai Stock Exchange" and OpenVMS
- From: Michael Kraemer
- Re: "Shanghai Stock Exchange" and OpenVMS
- From: AEF
- "Shanghai Stock Exchange" and OpenVMS
- Prev by Date: Re: "Shanghai Stock Exchange" and OpenVMS
- Next by Date: Re: "Shanghai Stock Exchange" and OpenVMS
- Previous by thread: Re: "Shanghai Stock Exchange" and OpenVMS
- Next by thread: Re: "Shanghai Stock Exchange" and OpenVMS
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|