Re: OT: Intel 2009 roadmap
- From: billg999@xxxxxxxxxxx (Bill Gunshannon)
- Date: 12 Feb 2009 12:20:06 GMT
In article <82dd9842-2918-4fa7-8d57-d0df22520196@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Neil Rieck <n.rieck@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
This idea pops up from time-to-time but I wonder if it isn't time to
raise it again. If HP has no interest in OpenVMS, then maybe they
should sell the whole division to Intel
What could possibly make Intel interested in buying VMS?
(who might pay to have it
ported to x86-64).
If they were having problems selling x86-64, that might be needed, but
they aren't. Other people are doing all the OSes they need to sell
chips at no cost to them at all.
If Intel doesn't want to pay real dollars then
maybe they could swap a year's worth of x86-64 silicon for the whole
I doubt VMS would be worth a bucket of spit to Intel.
This way, Intel gets to become an enterprise server
They are a chip manufacturer, why would they want to be an "enterprise
and HP gets to become a PC company.
HP already is a PC company.
Finally both companies get
what they want.
Seems to me that they both already have that without even factoring
VMS into the equation. Which does not bode well for VMS, does it?
Bill Gunshannon | de-moc-ra-cy (di mok' ra see) n. Three wolves
billg999@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx | and a sheep voting on what's for dinner.
University of Scranton |
Scranton, Pennsylvania | #include <std.disclaimer.h>
- Prev by Date: Re: "Shanghai Stock Exchange" and OpenVMS
- Next by Date: Re: eXcursion newbie question
- Previous by thread: Re: Should HP sell OpenVMS?
- Next by thread: Re: OT: Intel 2009 roadmap