Re: BACKUP/FAST (was Re: Backup Command)
- From: "Richard Brodie" <R.Brodie@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 14:05:48 +0100
"AEF" <spamsink2001@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:e90bf9d2-8593-434f-9cfc-85c881f2a257@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I don't know what it means to synchronize with the file system and why
write access is needed if no update is to be made.
I would guess it acquires write locks to force the filesystem to flush
its cache.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: BACKUP/FAST (was Re: Backup Command)
- From: johnwallace4
- Re: BACKUP/FAST (was Re: Backup Command)
- From: AEF
- Re: BACKUP/FAST (was Re: Backup Command)
- References:
- [Info-vax] BACKUP/FAST (was Re: Backup Command)
- From: norm . raphael
- Re: BACKUP/FAST (was Re: Backup Command)
- From: AEF
- Re: BACKUP/FAST (was Re: Backup Command)
- From: Bob Koehler
- Re: BACKUP/FAST (was Re: Backup Command)
- From: AEF
- [Info-vax] BACKUP/FAST (was Re: Backup Command)
- Prev by Date: Re: BACKUP/FAST (was Re: Backup Command)
- Next by Date: Re: BACKUP/FAST (was Re: Backup Command)
- Previous by thread: Re: BACKUP/FAST (was Re: Backup Command)
- Next by thread: Re: BACKUP/FAST (was Re: Backup Command)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|