Re: Whither VMS?

In article <00249d7e$0$11333$c3e8da3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, JF Mezei
<jfmezei.spamnot@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

Anti trust.

And why should HP care, they're not involved in antitrust issues.

Governments might not agree to Oracle giving Sun's leftovers
for HP to just kill them.

If Oracle don't want Sun's hardware business they could
just try to sell it off. If HP buys it, what could government say?

The industry would have gone from a wealth of
different architectures to only IBM Power and Intel/AMDs 8086. And since
Power is essentially proprietary in the enterprise server business, the
governments might rule that disapearance of Sparc would cause too much
concentration on the 8086.

With the same logic they could have forbidden Apple
to switch to intel. Too much concentration on x86 on the desktop.


Secondly, HP will have been burned by the failure of IA64 to take off,

It is my understanding that HP feels being burned my making
non-standard chips altogether.

while seeing IBM able maintain technological edge with its Power.

Only if one assumes that it is HP's goal to have technological edge
with home-made stuff at all. I think they (Carly) have made it clear
that this is not their goal. They relegated R&D to Intel and M$
and try to sell as many x86 commodity stuff as possible.

Perhaps HP might decide that it needs to get back into the chip business
to be able to control its own future and compete against IBM.

For them, controlling the future of ink cartridges is enough.
As for computers, since they consume a significant
amount of x86 CPUs they probably have some say at what goes on
at intel.

If it hadn't been for the Oracle takeover of Sun, I don't think that HP
would have even thought about restarting chip development.

And I don't think they are considering it now.
Plus, AFAIK it's not Sun which develops and makes Sparc CPUs,
but a separate SPARC company (+Fujitsu).
I don't think these companies were for sale too.

Their goal
would have been to move to 8086 once IA64 reaches its end.

And it still is.
Drop VMS and offer an Linux/x86 "upgrade" path for HP-UX.

But with Sun
essentially going out of business (or so it appears),

unless Oracle reverts their decision, Sun is already history.

HP might need to
to reconsider many aspects of its long term plans.

HP neds to be careful. If it is drunken with the thought of growing
support revenues by buying Sun, it may not realise the impact of getting
Solaris and Sparc machines with it.

I don't think they need your advise.
Already the fate of DEC has shown, that even support revenues
appearing as cash cow do not necessarily translate into big profits when
the costs of making lots of own stuff are subtracted.

What bugs me in all that is why would Ellison buy Sun just to get Java
and mySQL and sell the rest ? Ellison seems like he is able to
strategise intelligently and be above hype.

He hasn't "got" Java, and just for mySQL the price would be a bit steep.
He got means to complete Oracle's main business, i.e. now
they can offer complete solutions: hardware, OS, middleware, database.

And from HP's point of view, it would depend on how Hurd views Carly's
decision to buy Compaq

I don't believe he would waste a single thought on that. Done deal.

and whether it was all worth it at the end,

Of course it was, unfortunately.
In revenue HP is about as big as IBM,
in profits not far behind. Of course most of
it doesn't come from "real computers", but do shareholders care?

considering that they didn't leverage much out of it (except DEC's disk
storage products). If Hurd doesn't think highly of the decision to buy
Compaq, he might not think highly of a plan to buy Sun.

Sun is not for sale. Oracle has it now.
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Sun to use AMD Opteron - announcement expected Monday
    ... their business goals, they it should be within their business management ... >> performance was not worth the continued investment, ... > Certainly folks who really wanted SPARC ... >> (and Sun) to shine could complain just as vehemently that Sun made a bad ...
    (comp.os.vms)
  • Re: Sun to use AMD Opteron - announcement expected Monday
    ... it has absolutely no business making claims about industry standard or "commodity". ... On the other hand, IA64 may be ... When Sun ... made Solaris available on the 8086, did it spell the doom of Sparc? ...
    (comp.os.vms)
  • Re: Technical Animism
    ... within 'organised' matter, and that the matter then becomes an ... then the sun might even not be a good performer. ... First I never claimed a causal relationship between organized ... For example for a business, ...
    (sci.logic)
  • Re: [opensuse] Why are there not more using Linux?
    ... Dude Sun and Sarc are going no where any time soon... ... Sun is going to abandon the SPARC soon. ... As much as I despise the Intel x86 with its architecture ... Intel and AMD won the CPU wars. ...
    (SuSE)
  • Re: HP admits discontinued IA64 workstations
    ... > I don't recall ever holding the opinion that Sun was a late comer to 8086. ... Sun moving to 8086 so it can abandon Sparc." ... customers rather than adopting the typical MS attitude of "we know what is ... There is an equivalent to PhotoShop that is Opensource. ...
    (comp.os.vms)
Loading