547.53 GB vs. 600 GB?
- From: gartmann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Christoph Gartmann)
- Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2010 08:59:35 +0000 (UTC)
Hello,
give is a directory on an ODS5 disk with the following contents:
DIR/SIZE=ALL/GRAND [...]
Grand total of 5 directories, 18 files, 547.53GB/547.53GB
So I thought this should fit onto two SDLT600 using the following command:
$ BACKUP/LOG/IGNORE=INTERLOCK diskx:[heun...] mkb200:pc127.bck/SAVE -
/LABEL=(HEUN1,HEUN2,HEUN3)/EXACT_ORDER/BLOCK=32256
But in fact it required three tapes. Was this because I specified three labels
(just in case)? Or is the native capacity of a DLT600 smaller than 300 GB?
The data in question is already compressed, so there is no gain in any
compaction.
Regards,
Christoph Gartmann
--
Max-Planck-Institut fuer Phone : +49-761-5108-464 Fax: -80464
Immunbiologie
Postfach 1169 Internet: gartmann@immunbio dot mpg dot de
D-79011 Freiburg, Germany
http://www.immunbio.mpg.de/home/menue.html
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: 547.53 GB vs. 600 GB?
- From: Bob Koehler
- Re: 547.53 GB vs. 600 GB?
- From: Paul Sture
- Re: 547.53 GB vs. 600 GB?
- From: Richard Brodie
- Re: 547.53 GB vs. 600 GB?
- Prev by Date: Re: IE8 got me too :-( Sorry Jeff.
- Next by Date: Re: SFTP ACCVIOs
- Previous by thread: What would prevent fp_class from linking?
- Next by thread: Re: 547.53 GB vs. 600 GB?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|