Re: VMS port to x86
- From: Johnny Billquist <bqt@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 02 Jun 2012 23:43:53 +0200
On 2012-06-02 18:39, Phillip Helbig---undress to reply wrote:
In article<31rp99-725.ln1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Paul Sture
<paul.nospam@xxxxxxxx> writes:
LOL. We could also go back to CompuServe, which was accessible by dumb
terminals (and IIRC ran on PDP-10s), and others like it.
I once read that the CompuServe username mapped to a PDP directory name.
Any truth to that?
Probably, in a way. Compuserve ran PDP-10s, with their own OS, which was based on TOPS-10. The "username" was the PPN, which is the TOPS-10 equivalent of the UIC in VMS.
It was pretty normal in TOPS-10 to have your "home" directory to be the same as your PPN (if not required), but since Compuserve hacked things a lot, who knows what, if any mapping, was used in their OS.
(Btw, PPN stands for Project, Programmer Number)
Johnny
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: VMS port to x86
- From: glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: VMS port to x86
- References:
- Re: VMS port to x86
- From: John Wallace
- Re: VMS port to x86
- From: ChrisQ
- Re: VMS port to x86
- From: John Wallace
- Re: VMS port to x86
- From: ChrisQ
- Re: VMS port to x86
- From: John Wallace
- Re: VMS port to x86
- From: Paul Sture
- Re: VMS port to x86
- From: Jan-Erik Soderholm
- Re: VMS port to x86
- From: Phillip Helbig---undress to reply
- Re: VMS port to x86
- Prev by Date: Re: Microkernel
- Next by Date: Re: VMS port to x86
- Previous by thread: Re: VMS port to x86
- Next by thread: Re: VMS port to x86
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|