DCL, was: Re: Microkernel (was: VMS port to x86)
- From: Simon Clubley <clubley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2012 18:49:39 +0000 (UTC)
On 2012-06-03, Paul Sture <paul.nospam@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Fri, 01 Jun 2012 17:22:37 +0000, Simon Clubley wrote:
Would you blindly implement all the special quoting required for ODS-5
volumes or would you implement another approach which reduced the
special quoting requirements ?
I've always hated that caret business. Dollar signs in filenames aren't
very friendly for a GNV environment either.
Agreed on both, but with bash, it's at least very good about inserting the
reserved symbol escape character if you use tab completion.
A refresh of DCL, with current CLI standards in mind, could be quite a
nice thing.
Things I would like to see in a new and improved DCL:
Editing of command lines longer than the terminal width.
Filename tab completion with a list of matching options displayed if you
keep pressing tab.
Incremental recall of commands bash style (hit Ctrl-R and start typing).
Optionally writing out the commands entered in the current session to the
end of a existing history file when you logout and having those commands
automatically available for you at next login as part of the command
history. (I am thinking .bash_history here).
Structured programming constructs (while/do-until/etc).
Associative arrays/sets and supporting set based loop structures. It would
also be nice to have the output from a lexical such as f$search optionally
returned as a set.
Ability to use a regex in a wildcard file specification.
Site specific lexical functions.
Simon.
--
Simon Clubley, clubley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Microsoft: Bringing you 1980s technology to a 21st century world
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: DCL, was: Re: Microkernel (was: VMS port to x86)
- From: Paul Sture
- Re: DCL, was: Re: Microkernel (was: VMS port to x86)
- From: Bob Koehler
- Re: DCL, was: Re: Microkernel (was: VMS port to x86)
- References:
- Re: Microkernel (was: VMS port to x86)
- From: Keith Parris
- Re: Microkernel (was: VMS port to x86)
- From: Simon Clubley
- Re: Microkernel (was: VMS port to x86)
- From: Paul Sture
- Re: Microkernel (was: VMS port to x86)
- Prev by Date: Re: Still no IPSEC for TCP/IP services?
- Next by Date: Re: VMS Alpha v. Google Groups
- Previous by thread: Re: Microkernel (was: VMS port to x86)
- Next by thread: Re: DCL, was: Re: Microkernel (was: VMS port to x86)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|