Palm top VMS, was: Re: Poulson 6 times more powerful than Tukwilla?
- From: Simon Clubley <clubley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2012 13:48:41 +0000 (UTC)
On 2012-07-07, David Froble <davef@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Richard B. Gilbert wrote:
"palm top VAXen"?
Ooops, I'll have find something to mop up the drool. . . !
Serious question, no flame intended ....
Other than seeing the "$" prompt, what would you do with a palm top VAX ??
Think about "palm top VMS" instead of "palm top VAX" especially if it's
running in native mode instead of inside a emulator. There are a wide
range of embedded uses for something in that form factor (or similar
small/portable form factors).
However, it's about 5-10 years too late for that market segment
unfortunately, even if VMS (or something more easily ported which looked
like VMS at a API/capability level) was available for low cost/free;
Linux and various RTOS options have become well established in that area.
Simon.
--
Simon Clubley, clubley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Microsoft: Bringing you 1980s technology to a 21st century world
.
- References:
- Poulson 6 times more powerful than Tukwilla?
- From: Dirk Munk
- Re: Poulson 6 times more powerful than Tukwilla?
- From: IanMiller
- Re: Poulson 6 times more powerful than Tukwilla?
- From: Phillip Helbig---undress to reply
- Re: Poulson 6 times more powerful than Tukwilla?
- From: Richard B. Gilbert
- Re: Poulson 6 times more powerful than Tukwilla?
- From: David Froble
- Poulson 6 times more powerful than Tukwilla?
- Prev by Date: Re: Ars Technica on HP plans for Itanium and x86
- Next by Date: Re: VMS on Multia/UDB (continued)
- Previous by thread: Re: Poulson 6 times more powerful than Tukwilla?
- Next by thread: Re: Poulson 6 times more powerful than Tukwilla?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|