Re: DEC Server messages
From: Maria Suggitt (maria.suggitt_at_emersonprocess.com)
Date: 05/27/03
- Next message: Bob Blunt: "Re: Can I use a DS-BA356 for this?"
- Previous message: Maria Suggitt: "Re: DEC Server messages"
- In reply to: Keith A. Lewis: "Re: DEC Server messages"
- Next in thread: Richard Tomkins: "Re: DEC Server messages"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: 27 May 2003 02:13:52 -0700
Unfortunately I cannot access the document below
lewis@PROBE.mitre.org (Keith A. Lewis) wrote in message news:<baj61p$qsb$1@newslocal.mitre.org>...
> maria.suggitt@emersonprocess.com (Maria Suggitt) writes in article <9676d376.0305220300.42d2adf8@posting.google.com> dated 22 May 2003 04:00:49 -0700:
> =I have a DEC & DEC server connected via a hub (which is also connected
> =to the company network). Recently the serial links from the DEC Server
> =(90TL) have been dropping out & re-establishing themselves
> =
> =From the DEC server I have got the following information
> =
> =DECserver 90TL V1.1 BL44G-10A LAT V5.1 ROM 2.0.0 Uptime: 76
> =17:28:55
> =
> =Seconds Since Zeroed: 6629335 Frames Sent, 1 Collision: 4100
> =Bytes Received: 3566439246 Frames Sent, 2+ Collisions: 2161
> =Bytes Sent: 4294967295 Send Failures: 5
> =Frames Received: 59817498 Send Failure Reasons: 0000100001
> =Frames Sent: 54541015 Receive Failures: 250257
> =Multicast Bytes Rcv'd: 12736186 Receive Failure Reasons: 0000000011
> =Multicast Bytes Sent: 18826022 Unrecognized Destination: 0
> =Multicast Frames Rcv'd: 214165 Data Overrun: 0
> =Multicast Frames Sent: 254695 User Buffer Unavailable: 85
> =Frames Sent, Deferred: 73872 System Buffer Unavailable: 2
> =
> =Messages Received: 59427091 Duplicates Received: 45200
> =Messages Transmitted: 54272213 Messages Re-Transmitted: 30204
> =Solicitations Accepted: 9062 Illegal Messages Rcv'd: 0
> =Solicitations Rejected: 0 Illegal Slots Rcv'd: 0
> =Multiple Node Addresses: 0 Illegal Multicasts Rcv'd: 0
> =
> =Can anyone tell me what it all means... or point me in the direction
> =of some decent documentation
>
> The only bad number I see is receive failures. Here's a link to a doc which
> might help.
>
> http://search.yahoo.com/search?p=%22Receive+Failure+Reasons%22&ei=UTF-8&vm=i&n=20&fl=0&x=wrt
>
> --Keith Lewis klewis$mitre.org
> The above may not (yet) represent the opinions of my employer.
- Next message: Bob Blunt: "Re: Can I use a DS-BA356 for this?"
- Previous message: Maria Suggitt: "Re: DEC Server messages"
- In reply to: Keith A. Lewis: "Re: DEC Server messages"
- Next in thread: Richard Tomkins: "Re: DEC Server messages"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|