Re: TDMS (was: Re: [survey] why do you still use VAX systems?)
From: Alan Winston - SSRL Admin Cmptg Mgr (winston_at_SSRL.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU)
Date: 10/29/03
- Previous message: H Vlems: "Re: TDMS (was: Re: [survey] why do you still use VAX systems?)"
- In reply to: H Vlems: "Re: TDMS (was: Re: [survey] why do you still use VAX systems?)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2003 23:16:34 GMT
In article <bnmf5i$125up2$1@ID-143435.news.uni-berlin.de>, "H Vlems" <hvlems.nieuw@zonnet.nl> writes:
>
>"Hoff Hoffman" <hoff@hp.nospam> schreef in bericht
>news:kBknb.7885$Sw3.7848@news.cpqcorp.net...
>> In article <bnbjut$va82l$1@ID-143435.news.uni-berlin.de>, "H Vlems"
><hvlems.nieuw@zonnet.nl> writes:
>> :
>> :There's no (good) support for TDMS for Alpha/VMS/
>>
>> http://h71000.www7.hp.com/commercial/cpss.html#tdms
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------- #include
><rtfaq.h> -----------------------------
>> For additional, please see the OpenVMS FAQ --
>www.hp.com/go/openvms/faq
>> --------------------------- pure personal
>opinion ---------------------------
>> Hoff (Stephen) Hoffman OpenVMS Engineering hoff[at]hp.com
>>
>Hi Hoff,
>
>when I wrote the memo (somewhere in 2001) I was not aware of Alpha VMS
>support for TDMS. I forwarded the link to my previous employer, they might
>still be unaware of this service.
I don't remember when the TDMS port for Alpha came in, but I'm kinda
frustrated as an EDU/CSLG user. The VAX version of TDMS was on the CSLG;
the Alpha version isn't, and it's not cheap. We already paid for the PRAXA
TDMS emulator when we moved to Alpha in 1995 (and paid several thousand
dollars more in getting PRAXA to fix access violations in the code), and
that emulator doesn't include a forms editor. We currently maintain a
VAX 4000/90 for the exclusive purpose of running the TDMS forms editor for
the several times a year we need to change forms for existing applications.
I'd like to have TDMS for Alpha in the CSLG so I can ditch that remaining
VAX, save maintenance costs and desk space, and reduce my headaches in
general. Instead, if we don't manage to rewrite all our TDMS applications
into web-based ones, I'll likely someday have to go to Charon-VAX or SIMH
or something.
[I'm venting my personal frustration here; I can't make any realistic
business case for HP to put this software in the CSLG so I can have it
without giving them any more money.]
-- Alan
>Thanks,
>
>Hans
>
>
-- =============================================================================== Alan Winston --- WINSTON@SSRL.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU Disclaimer: I speak only for myself, not SLAC or SSRL Phone: 650/926-3056 Paper mail to: SSRL -- SLAC BIN 99, 2575 Sand Hill Rd, Menlo Park CA 94025 ===============================================================================
- Previous message: H Vlems: "Re: TDMS (was: Re: [survey] why do you still use VAX systems?)"
- In reply to: H Vlems: "Re: TDMS (was: Re: [survey] why do you still use VAX systems?)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]